发挥计财基础参谋作用保障内蒙古气象事业持续发展

“十五”的5年,是内蒙古自治区经济社会快速发展的5年,也是内蒙古气象事业快速发展的阶段。2002年新一届党组成立后,提出了“十五”期间的总体工作思路:以邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想为指导,认真贯彻党的十六大和十六届三中、四中全会精神,全面落实科学发展观,以提升气象     

把精神文明建设融入气象科技服务中

为了全面落实科学发展观，积极配合业务技术体制改革，实现“十一五”期间青海气象事业发展的总体目标，科技服务中心把开展精神明建设和思想政治工作作为一项基础性工作来抓，为气象科技服务事业健康发展营造了良好的氛围。     

坚定信心真抓实干 努力开创青海气象事业科学发展新局面（摘要）

一、2008年全省气象工作回顾 2008年是全面贯彻落实党的十七大精神的开局之年,是纪念改革开放30周年的奋进之年,也是改革发展进程中极不平凡的一年。国际形势发生新的复杂变化,国内大事要事难事多,改革发展任务繁重艰巨,压力挑战非同寻常。全省气象部门在中国气象局和省委、省政府的坚强领导下,高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜,以邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想为指导,深入贯彻落实科学发展观,认真贯彻党的十七大精神,全面落实省委十一届五次全会和全国气象局长会议精神,全继续解放思想,坚持改革开放,积极应对挑战,主动抢抓机遇,     

论江西省气象局业务技术体制改革的总体思路及目标

阐述了新时期新阶段进行气象业务技术体制改革的重要性和必要性,并就改革的重点、总体思路和总体目标进行了论述,认为江西气象部门要在中国气象局的领导下,以“三个代表”重要思想为指导,全面贯彻落实科学发展观,按照中国气象局业务技术体制改革总体方案的要求,精心设计、全面部署,稳妥推进气象业务技术体制改革,从根本上解决制约江西气象事业快速发展的深层次矛盾和问题,促进江西气象工作更好地融入经济建设主战场,巩固和提升气象事业在江西经济社会发展中的地位和作用,实现江西气象事业又快又好地发展,为江西在中部地区崛起做出更大的贡献。     

2005年全省气象局长会议总结讲话

这次会议的主题是：以邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想为指导，认真贯彻党的十六大和十六届三中、四中全会精神，全面落实科学发展观，用中国气象事业发展战略总揽全局，坚持“公共气象、安全气象、资源气象”的发展理念，继续实施科技兴气象、拓展领域、人才强局战略，努力提高天气预警预报和气候预测预估水平，切实增强气象事业发展能力，努力开创气象事业发展新局面。     

深入学习贯彻党的二十大精神在气象高质量发展新征程上竞标争先——2023年全省气象局长会议报告

<正>(2023年1月18日)这次会议的主要任务是：以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，全面学习贯彻党的二十大精神，以习近平总书记关于气象工作重要指示精神为根本遵循，总结2022年气象工作，部署2023年重点工作，推动我省在气象高质量发展新征程上继续走在全国前列、作出示范。12022年工作回顾2022年，全省气象部门全面学习、全面把握、全面落实党的二十大精神，充分发挥气象防灾减灾第一道防线作用，着力推动气象高质量发展，气象服务国家服务人民不断取得新进展新成效。     

解放思想，科学发展，努力开创广东气象工作新局面

2008年全省气象工作的总体要求是：高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜,以邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想为指导,深入贯彻落实科学发展观,深入贯彻党的十七大精神,全面贯彻落实中国气象局和广东省委、省政府的战略部署和任务,切实加强学习,增强忧患意识,进一步解放思想,坚持改革创新,全力推进现代气象业务体系建设,努力开创各项工作新局面,增强广东气象事业发展后劲,争当实践科学发展观的排头兵。立足于防大灾抗大灾,全力做好气象防灾减灾和应对气候变化工作。夯实科学发展基础,切实加强科技创新、人才队伍建设和基层基础工作。认真履行职责,强化气象社会管理和科学管理工作。发扬改革创新精神,全面加强反腐倡廉和气象文化建设。     

以科学发展观为指导 促进青海气象事业跨越式发展——常国刚局长在2005年全省气象局长会议工作报告（摘要）

2005年全省气象工作的总体要求是：以邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想为指导，深入贯彻落实党的十六大和十六届四中全会精神，树立公共气象、安全气象和资源气象的新理念，按照全国气象局长会议和省委农村牧区工作会议的总体部署，全面落实科学发展观，进一步推进“三大战略”的实施，促进青海气象事业跨越式发展。     

深入贯彻国务院3号文件和省政府26号文件促进江西气象事业在更高起点上又好又快地发展——在全省气象工作会议上的工作报告

全面总结和回顾了“十五”以来全省气象工作取得的成绩和经验,并在客观分析江西气象事业发展面临的问题的基础上,对2007年和今后一段时期全省气象工作进行了科学部署。报告指出,《国务院关于加快气象事业发展的若干意见》(国发〔2006〕3号)和《江西省人民政府关于加快气象事业发展的意见》(赣府发〔2006〕26号)两个文件,是新时期指导江西气象事业又好又快地发展的纲领性文件。江西气象部门要切实承担责任,充分发挥贯彻落实国务院3号文件和省政府26号文件的主力军作用,紧密团结在以胡锦涛同志为总书记的党中央周围,高举邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想伟大旗帜,全面贯彻落实科学发展观,按照温家宝总理提出的“一流装备、一流技术、一流人才、一流台站”的要求,坚持公共气象的发展方向,进一步强化气象观测基础,提高预报预测水平,加快科技创新,丰富气象服务内涵,努力提升气象事业为构建社会主义和谐社会的服务能力,为在新的起点上实现江西崛起的新跨越提供一流气象服务,从而为富民兴赣、实现江西崛起新跨越,为构建“大气象”格局、实现中国由气象大国向气象强国迈进做出新的更大贡献。     

基层实施"三大战略"的探索

近年来,漯河市气象局注重全面落实科学发展观,树立"社会大气象"新观念,突破气象工作几十年一贯制的传统思想局限,实施"三大战略",为漯河气象事业的发展注入了新的生机与活力.     

充分发挥各级减灾委员会的作用为建设和谐平安江西保驾护航--在全省领导干部减灾管理研讨班上的讲话(摘录)

介绍了“全省领导干部减灾管理研讨班”的基本概况,并就今后一段时期的综合减灾工作提出了具体建议。讲话认为,要认真贯彻、落实省政府吴新雄常务副省长、省政协倪国熙副主席在减灾管理研讨班上的讲话精神,编制好减灾综合规划,组织开展自然灾害总结、预测会商与科研工作,加强防灾减灾知识的普及宣传教育工作,加强灾害信息收集、汇总工作,逐步实现资源信息共享;各级减灾委要不断加强自身能力建设,积极组织开展省外、境外、国外减灾考察活动,不断拓宽减灾领导、专家的视野。使江西综合成灾工作逐步与国际接轨,从而为建设和谐平安江西做出积极的贡献。     

基于GIT的气象数值模式代码管理平台METCODE

随着气象数值模式的发展完善,已广泛应用于国家级和区域中心,研发力量地理上分散。支撑数值模式运行的高性能计算机系统呈现出异构众核的发展趋势,模式研发的学科交叉衍生性越发明显,分布式模式研发的高效协同共享成为一个亟待解决的问题。本文基于Git建立了一个代码管理协作共享平台METCODE,实现了气象数值模式的代码版本管理、集成协作共享与过程管理,方便地支持分布式团队的合作研发。平台已在气象数值模式的研发中成功应用,应用效益良好。     

搞好基层气象档案工作的几点思考

随着气象事业的快速发展，基层气象部门的档案管理工作逐步走向规范化、制度化、科学化。本文分析了基层气象档案管理工作中存在的问题，提出了改进和做好基层气象档案工作的意见。     

江西省人工影响天气工作高质量发展思考

为贯彻落实国务院、江西省委省政府关于推进人工影响天气工作高质量发展的部署,通过现场座谈、信函采访、电话咨询、问卷调查等方式,围绕人工影响天气组织体系、法规体系、业务体系、服务体系、科研体系、安全体系、经费保障机制等方面,对贵州、重庆、宁夏、甘肃、云南、福建6个省（市）人工影响天气工作现状和未来发展进行调研,总结了外省在人工影响天气工作中许多值得学习的经验,同时对比分析了江西省人工影响天气工作的的短板和优势,提出推进江西省人工影响天气工作高质量发展的对策与建议。     

不断提高自然灾害应急管理水平促进社会和谐稳定和经济又好又快发展——在全省领导干部自然灾害应急管理研讨班开学典礼上的讲话

阐述了全球与江西的自然灾害发生情况和造成的损失,着重介绍了全球气候变化趋势及其危害,以及在此背景下的江西气候变化特征,认为严重的自然灾害已经而且会越来越成为制约经济社会快速健康发展的重要因素。要求各级政府和各级领导要落实江西省防灾减灾“十一五”规划,落实各类自然灾害应急预案,落实自然灾害应急管理队伍,通过加强自然灾害评估,加强自然灾害应急宣传教育,加强协调与配合,不断提高自然灾害监测、预警、预报能力,自然灾害应急领域的科技创新能力,以及自然灾害应急管理和处置能力。     

Why delaying emission reductions is a gamble

In the debate on the timing of greenhouse gas emissions reductions the aspect of political feasibility has often been missing. We introduce this aspect and show that, if we decide to delay emissions reductions, and the environmental effectiveness of global mitigation efforts is to remain the same in terms of temperature change, we must be willing and able to undertake much more substantial emission reductions than with early action. Even under conservative assumptions on initial political feasibility (maximum 0.25% year-on-year reductions), a 20-year delay means that we must reduce emissions at an annual rate that is 5 to 11 times greater than with early climate action. Our capacity for technological progress, political change and the inertia of the socio-economic system gives us reason to be concerned about our ability to achieve such higher rates of emission reductions. If we are not able to achieve such higher rates, delaying action will inevitably result in higher temperatures in 2100. Unless we are willing to accept higher temperatures, choosing to delay climate action is a gamble that political feasibility will increase over time as a result of the delay itself.     

Constraining and enabling factors to using long-term climate information in decision-making

We carry out a structured review of the peer-reviewed literature to assess the factors that constrain and enable the uptake of long-term climate information in a wide range of sectoral investment and planning decisions. Common applications of long-term climate information are shown to relate to urban planning and infrastructure, as well as flood and coastal management. Analysis of the identified literature highlights five categories of constraints: disconnection between users and producers of climate information, limitations of climate information, financial and technical constraints, political economy and institutional constraints and finally psycho-social constraints. Five categories of enablers to the uptake of long-term climate information in decision-making are also identified: collaboration and bridge work, increased accessibility of climate information, improvement in the underlying science, institutional reform and windows of opportunity for building trust.

Policy relevance

Our review suggests that stand-alone interventions aimed at promoting the uptake of climate information into decision-making are unlikely to succeed without genuine and sustained relationships between producers and users. We also highlight that not every decision requires consideration of long-term climate information for successful outcomes to be achieved. This is particularly the case in the context of developing countries, where the immediacy of development challenges means that decision makers often prioritize short-term interventions. Care should therefore be taken to ensure that information is targeted towards investments and planning decisions that are relevant to longer-term timescales.     

Governing geoengineering research: why, when and how?

Research on geoengineering – deliberate management of the Earth’s climate system – is being increasingly discussed within the science and policy communities. While justified as necessary in order to expand the range of options available to policy makers in the future, geoengineering research has already engendered public controversy. Proposed projects have been protested or cancelled, and calls for a governance framework abound. In this paper, we consider the reasons why geoengineering research might be subject to additional governance and suggest mechanisms that might be usefully applied in developing such a framework. We consider criteria for governance as raised by a review of the growing literature on geoengineering and other controversial scientific topics. We suggest three families of concern that any governance research framework must respond to: the direct physical risks of the research; the transparency and responsibility in decision making for the research; and the larger societal meanings of the research. We review what mechanisms might be available to respond to these three families of concern, and consider how these might apply to geoengineering research.     

Building a regime for climate protection: Finland and international climate policy

The effective management of climate change on a national as well as an international level requires close co-operation between the scientific community and the political sector. Climate change first became a major subject of scientific inquiry in the early 1980s, and real political interest in the issue was awakened towards the end of that decade. In the last few years, the dialogue between the scientific community and the political sector has increased considerably. As a result, climate change is today one of the most significant areas in environmental research and international environmental policy alike.This paper examines the emergence and consolidation of international climate change regime. The theory of regime building is used as discussed by Young (1989). International Cooperation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. The paper begins with an outline of the historical emergence of climate research and climate policy. This is followed by a discussion of the history and development of the Rio Convention, with a look at the latest developments in international climate politics. The next section begins with an examination of the foundations and present strategies of Finnish climate policy, which is used as a case study, and the paper concludes with an assessment of the current state of Finnish climate policy, illustrating the problems of compliance individual countries face when adopting the norms and principles of the regime.     

Do Regional Disparities in Research on Climate and Water Influence Adaptive Capacity?

As part of a long-term effort to both improve access to information on climate change and freshwater resources, and to understand the state of the science, we compiled an electronic bibliography of scientific literature in that area. We analyzed the distribution of information on climatic impacts on freshwater resources, with an emphasis on differences between developed and developing regions as well as differences in the types and focus of research carried out among regions. There has been more research overall in developed countries than in the developing world. Proportionally more of the available research on natural and human systems pertains to developed regions, while most of the analysis done in developing countries is limited to higher-level climatology and hydrology. We argue that scientific information and understanding are important elements of the ability to adapt to potential climatic changes. The distribution of the scientific literature in our database suggests that the types of science most directly relevant to adaptive capacity are skewed towards developed countries, which may exacerbate existing disparities in adaptive capacity, and ultimately worsen the consequences of climatic impacts in developing countries.