2004年4月11日AR0588中环形暗条爆发与CME的研究

利用云南天文台色球Hα单色像、SOHO/EITEUV单色像、SOHO/LASCO白光日冕观测、SOHO/MDI光球磁图及Nobeyama17GHz微波射电观测资料对2004年4月11日AR0588中的环形暗条爆发进行了初步的分析。主要结论如下:(1)爆发的暗条呈现封闭的环形。在Hα观测上爆发前有明显的激活态,表现为西半环变粗变厚,断裂出现缺口并缓慢向西南方向上升。在EIT195 观测上,此暗条爆发表现出两条扎根于爆发源区的亮带,其顶部可能是爆发中的暗条,而这两条亮带是暗条的两条腿。该暗条爆发是动力学爆发,但暗条等离子体在爆发过程中也受到明显的加热。(2)该暗条爆发伴随有一个明显的双带耀斑。一个带位于暗条爆发的中心,几乎不动,而另一个带呈环状包围爆发的暗条,展示明显的分离运动。这两个带之间,在耀斑后期出现明显的耀斑后环。(3)这一暗条爆发及耀斑与LASCO观测到的一个快速的、具有典型三部分结构的partialHaloCME在时间和空间上是密切相关的。     

1993年10月2日耀斑的Hα,微波和硬X射线暴的综合分析

本文介绍1993年10月2日发生的一个1N／C6.5级耀斑多波段观测的结果．综合比较了耀斑的单色象，Hα波段工维光谱，2840兆赫微波爆发和硬X射线爆发资料．得到Hα单色象上不同亮核的强度变化，与微波及硬X射线暴的时间轮廓比较，给出了色球耀斑区亮度场的演化，对照磁图确定了耀斑区的磁场位形，从而对该耀斑产生和加热提出了一种可能的解释．     

导致太阳耀斑爆发的暗条扭绞

本文主要根据Ｈａ线心和不同偏带的观测资料，结合紫外ＣＩＶ１５４８谱线的测量结果，分析研究了１９８０年６月２５日ＡＲ２５２２活动区中一段暗条在耀斑爆发前１５分钟所经历的三次逐渐增强的间歇式扭绞，最终导致暗条破裂和耀斑爆发的物理过程，并且用无力场磁绳近似模拟时间条的扭绞运动，估算了暗条扭绞引直怕无力因子ａ的变化，轴向电流增大和守能，讨论了暗条的稳定性，试图对暗条的瓦解和耀斑爆发予以理论解释。     

1981年4月1日日面4N耀斑环系的光学前兆与活动特征

根据云南天文台太阳色球H_α和相应的光球黑子观测以及磁场测量,并结合有关X—ray资料等,对1981年4月1日日面4N大耀斑进行了部份测量和分析。结果表明,该耀斑为环系;光球浮现磁流和黑子扭曲、挤压和剪切运动是触发该耀斑的直接原因。而活动的黑子光桥又是浮现磁流的一种重要标志;耀斑环或带与磁场位形密切相关;耀斑后在运动空间原位置处光球又浮现出部份磁流;卵形暗条内预示能爆发大耀斑。     

1966年3月24日耀斑的分析研究

本文用数据方法分析了紫金山天文台色球望远镜观测的１９９６年３月２４日３Ｂ级双带主资料，结果表明：由于新浮磁流改变背景磁场，光球剪切运动引起暗条圆柱轴向磁力线扭转而使暗条电流增加，致使暗条整体力学平衡破坏，驱动暗条向上运动。并对暗条上升运动与耀斑爆发的物理关系进行了分析讨论。     

活动区形态发展与耀斑的关系

本文收集了1980年5月下旬从日面东边缘转出的三个活动区的有关形态资料和对应耀斑活动,分析得到结论如下:1.H_α单色像中出现的低磁弧是活动区迅速发展的重要标志。2.光球下面的扰动引起的黑子运动使磁流管扭曲是储能的重要条件。如果缺乏这种运动,即便是在复杂的磁场环境里也不利于大耀斑的触发。3.在 H_α和 H.K 线观测到黑子本影上出现的亮桥光谱。它的出现引起黑子分裂,从亮桥出现到周围谱斑被加热进而触发耀斑往往有1—2天的时间差,说明它们之间有一定的物理联系。4.观测到与耀斑有联系的暗环的膨胀和上升,说明新磁流浮现区与老场作用是触发耀斑的一个重要条件。     

1993年5月日面AR7500中暗条的动力学特征

本文利用光球磁场、色球Hα单色像和Hβ速度场等观测资料，分析了1993年5月日面AR7500中3个暗条的演化和动力学行为，得出4个结论：（1）3个暗条中两人是右旋暗条，一个是左旋暗条。（2）暗条附近两侧的色球纤维和光球横场几乎平行于暗条长轴，暗条端点处的黑子没有呈现明显的涡旋结构。（3）尖角处因为轴向场取向不同，一直没有发生暗条合并，即使其中一个右旋暗条消失后又重新形成也如此。（4）几天持续存在的左旋暗条，在两天的观测中未出现扰动激活，其中部为杂乱而不明显的运动因素。本文还讨论了可以用暗条的扭曲磁流绳模型来解释暗条的这些动力学行为，以及一些尚待进一步澄清的问题。     

光球物质的水平运动对暗条激活和耀斑爆发的影响

本文作者用数值方法讨论光球物质水平运动的两种基本模式－剪切运动和会聚运动对活动区背景磁场及暗条电流的影响，并由此分析它们与暗条激活以及耀斑爆发的物理关系，所得结果表明：（１）光球物质的水平运动在激活暗条和驱动耀斑爆发中具有重要的作用；（２）作为耀斑现象先兆之一的暗条激活过程，主要是由暗条电流的增强和背景磁场的演化所决定，这个过程的复杂性导致了耀斑现象物理机制和形态的多样性。     

1993年5月日面AR7500中暗条的动力学特征

本文利用光球磁场、色球Hα单色像和Hβ速度场等观测资料，分析了1993年5月日面AR7500中3个暗条的演化和动力学行为，得出4个结论(1)3个暗条中两个是右旋暗条，一个是左旋暗条。(2)暗条附近两侧的色球纤维和光球横场几乎平行于暗条长轴，暗条端点处的黑子没有呈现明显的涡旋结构。(3)尖角处因为轴向场取向不同，一直没有发生暗条合并，即使其中一个右旋暗条消失后又重新形成也如此。(4)几天持续存在的左旋暗条，在两天的观测中未出现扰动激活，其中部为杂乱而不明显的运动图案。本文还讨论了可以用暗条的扭曲磁流绳模型来解释暗条的这些动力学行为，以及一些尚待进一步澄清的问题。     

2004年1月8日活动区10537内耀斑和相关CME的分析研究

利用色球Hα线心像、TRACEUV和SOHO/EITEUV单色像、SOHO/LASCO白光日冕观测、SOHO/MDI光球磁图以及Nobeyama射电观测,对2004年1月8日日面边缘δ位形黑子群AR10537内发生的一个M1.3耀斑及相关的CME进行了初步的分析。该耀斑除了位于反极性磁场区域、覆盖部分黑子半影的两个主耀斑带外,还伴随有一个明显的远距离耀斑带,这表明有扰动能量沿大尺度日冕结构从耀斑源区向外传播。这一远区增亮处随后有EITdimming出现,表明色球蒸发导致的物质损失可能是产生日冕dimming的重要因素。另外,位于远距离耀斑带南面的一个大宁静暗条在耀斑发生后有部分消失,这可能与该耀斑导致的大尺度日冕磁场重构有关。该耀斑爆发与LASCO观测到的一个快速partialhaloCME在空间和时间上具有密切的关系,它们极可能是相同磁场过程在日冕的不同表现,故我们将此耀斑及与之伴随的日冕dimming认证为这一CME的日面源区。     

Magnetic Causes of the Eruption of a Quiescent Filament

During the JOP178 campaign in August 2006, we observed the disappearance of our target, a large quiescent filament located at S25°, after an observation time of three days (24 August to 26 August). Multi-wavelength instruments were operating: THEMIS/MTR (“MulTi-Raies”) vector magnetograph, TRACE (“Transition Region and Coronal Explorer”) at 171 Å and 1600 Å and Hida Domeless Solar telescope. Counter-streaming flows (+/?10 km?s^?1) in the filament were detected more than 24 hours before its eruption. A slow rise of the global structure started during this time period with a velocity estimated to be of the order of 1 km?s^?1. During the hour before the eruption (26 August around 09:00 UT) the velocity reached 5 km?s^?1. The filament eruption is suspected to be responsible for a slow CME observed by LASCO around 21:00 UT on 26 August. No brightening in Hα or in coronal lines, no new emerging polarities in the filament channel, even with the high polarimetry sensitivity of THEMIS, were detected. We measured a relatively large decrease of the photospheric magnetic field strength of the network (from 400 G to 100 G), whose downward magnetic tension provides stability to the underlying stressed filament magnetic fields. According to some MHD models based on turbulent photospheric diffusion, this gentle decrease of magnetic strength (the tension) could act as the destabilizing mechanism which first leads to the slow filament rise and its fast eruption.     

The Chiralities of Three Filaments in AR7500

1　ＩｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＩｔｉｓｎｏｗｗｅｌｌａｃｃｅｐｔｅｄｔｈｅｍａｇｎｅｔｉｃｆｉｅｌｄｉｎｆｉｌａｍｅｎｔｉｓｎｅａｒｌｙｈｏｒｉｚｏｎｔａｌａｎｄｔｈｅｃｏｍｐｏｎｅｎｔｏｆｔｈｅｆｉｅｌｄａｌｏｎｇｔｈｅｆｉｌａｍｅｎｔａｘｉｓｉｓｄｏｍｉｎａｎｔ (Ｄ啨ｍｏｕｌｉｎ ,1 997) .Ｗｈｅｎａｆｉｌａｍｅｎｔｉｓｐｒｅｓｅｎｔｉｎａｃｔｉｖｅｒｅｇｉｏｎ ,ｔｈｅｐｈｏｔｏｓｐｈｅｒｉｃｔｒａｎｓｖｅｒｓｅｆｉｅｌｄｂｅｎｅａｔｈｆｉｌａｍｅｎｔｍｏｓｔｌｙｌｉｅａｌｏｎｇｔｈｅｐｏｌａｒ…     

The twisting of filament that resulted in a solar flare

Based mainly on filtergrams ofH line center and various offbands and supplemented with measurements of the CIV 1548 line, we analyzed the evolution of a filament during a period of 15 minutes prior to the eruption of the flare of 1980 June 25 in the active region AR 2522. The filament underwent three spasmodic twistings of increasing size which finally led to its disruption and the flare eruption. We simulated the twisting motion of the filament by a force-free magnetic rope, estimated the variation of the force-free factor and the increase in the axial electric current, discussed the stability of the filament and attempted to give a theoretical explanation of the collapse of the filament and the eruption of the flare.     

Morphology of H-alpha filaments and filament channel systems

Ring-like filaments have been detected on the spectroheliograms in the H-alpha line. Inside these filaments the magnetic field flux has a predominant polarity. Some of the dark filaments are connected by filament channels which can be seen at the limb either as (a) weak prominences or (b) dense low chromospheric features or (c) multi-channel system of matter flow between two prominences or (d) common quiescent prominences. The filament and the filament channel together form a continuous closed contour and outline the region of thef polarity particularly at the beginning of the solar cycle. The change in sign of the polar field of the Sun is associated with the drift of the filament band to high latitudes.     

Two Sympathetic Homologous CMEs on 2002 May 22

Sympathetic coronal mass ejections (CMEs) usually occur in different active regions connected by interconnecting magnetic loops, while homologous CMEs occur within the same active region with an almost the same background magnetic field, and so are similar in shapes. Two sympathetic CMEs erupted within 3 hours on 2002 May 22, originating from the same active region, AR 9948. Their multi-wavelength data were collected and analyzed. It is suggested that emerging flux triggered the occurrence of the first CME and the corresponding flare, the reconnection inflow of which in turn triggered the eruption of the second CME. Based on the fact that the two sympathetic CMEs have many similarities, in their shapes, their low-lying dimming areas, etc., we tentatively propose, for the first time, the phenomenon of sympathetic homologous CMEs.     

A Filament—Associated Halo Coronal Mass Ejection

1 INTRODUCTIONCoronal majss ejections (CMEs) are often seen as spectacular eruptions of matter fromthe Sun which propagate outward through the heliosphere and often interact with the Earth'smagnetosphere (Hundhausen, 1997; Gosling, 1997; and references herein). It is well known thatthese interactions can have substalltial consequences on the geomagnetic environment of theEarth, sometimes resulting in damage to satellites (e.g., McAllister et al., 1996; Berdichevskyet al., 1998). CMEs…