中国区域创新的时空动态分析

基于探索性空间数据分析和验证性空间面板模型,本文探讨了2000年以来中国区域创新的时空动态。结果表明：① 自创新战略实施以来,中国各省区创新产出的年均增长率几乎都经历了一个剧烈的加速过程,说明区域创新能力的总体提升,但是,东部沿海地区仍然在创新产出中居于压倒性地位,导致“沿海—内陆”分化加剧和区域鸿沟的进一步突出,省区创新可能会陷入“强者愈强,弱者愈弱”的“马太效应”;② 中国区域创新产出与创新投入的空间集聚随时间推移不断强化,通过识别不同时期各变量“热点”,表明创新产出“热点”地区与创新投入“热点”具有高度的时空耦合特征;③ 人均GDP、研发投入、研发人员及在校大学生数对省区创新产出有显著的直接影响。省区间创新活动存在明显的空间溢出效应,其知识溢出的地理区域跨越了省区边界。空间依赖性的存在导致省区间创新活动具有反馈效应,相邻省区的知识溢出对该省区的创新活动具有实质性影响。     

中国能源消费碳排放强度及其影响因素的空间计量(英文)

The sustainable development has been seriously challenged by global climate change due to carbon emissions. As a developing country, China promised to reduce 40%–45% below the level of the year 2005 on its carbon intensity by 2020. The realization of this target depends on not only the substantive transition of society and economy at the national scale, but also the action and share of energy saving and emissions reduction at the provincial scale. Based on the method provided by the IPCC, this paper examines the spatiotemporal dynamics and dominating factors of China's carbon intensity from energy consumption in 1997–2010. The aim is to provide scientific basis for policy making on energy conservation and carbon emission reduction in China. The results are shown as follows. Firstly, China's carbon emissions increased from 4.16 Gt to 11.29 Gt from 1997 to 2010, with an annual growth rate of 7.15%, which was much lower than that of GDP(11.72%). Secondly, the trend of Moran's I indicated that China's carbon intensity has a growing spatial agglomeration at the provincial scale. The provinces with either high or low values appeared to be path-dependent or space-locked to some extent. Third, according to spatial panel econometric model, energy intensity, energy structure, industrial structure and urbanization rate were the dominating factors shaping the spatiotemporal patterns of China's carbon intensity from energy consumption. Therefore, in order to realize the targets of energy conservation and emission reduction, China should improve the efficiency of energy utilization, optimize energy and industrial structure, choose the low-carbon urbanization approach and implement regional cooperation strategy of energy conservation and emissions reduction.     

农业地域系统演变的动态模拟与优化调控研究——以东北地区为例

着眼于人地系统的复杂动态特征,基于东北地区农业地域系统的结构分析,运用系统动力学理论方法,构建农业地域系统演变的动态仿真模型。依据区域农业发展态势与未来目标,进行多情景模拟,提炼出传统发展、种植业结构优化发展和农牧综合协调发展3种代表性调控模式。对比分析后认为,农牧综合协调发展模式是东北地区农业地域系统较为合理的发展模式。构建合理农业地域结构必须控制非农用地快速扩张、挖掘农业综合生产潜能、培育优势农产品基地和产业带。     

基于局部聚类的网络Voronoi图生成方法研究

提出一种将网络约束下的Voronoi和空间聚类相结合的方法,通过构造局部的聚类分析方法对网络边进行加权,根据实际的点过程性质可以把权重定义为加权或者乘权,进行标准化后与道路段本身长度融合进行计算,依此生成网络Voronoi图,以期理解城市街道的空间特性。以武汉市江汉区为例,对城市网格管理系统产生的城市事件进行算法验证,结果表明,该方法提供了一种灵活的网络约束下的服务区域划分工具,可用于基于网络空间点过程影响下的服务区划分,也可用于系统性地定量刻画城市管理的动态特性。     

吉林省产业发展与能源效率研究(英文)

The relationship between economic development and energy consumption is revealed by employing cointegration theory, the index decomposition method, and a log-linear regression approach based on a case study of Jilin Province, China. The results suggest: 1) the economic development and energy consumption are interdetermined, whose relationship is positive and long-term. The economic development is highly depending on the energy in Jilin Province. 2) Under the condition of other unchanged factors, the change of industrial energy efficiency contributes to the energy saving, while that of industrial structure increases the energy consumption. 3) The industrial structure change enhances the energy intensity, but the energy utility efficiency change lowers it. From the view of contribution to the energy consumption, the contribution of industrial structure was more than that of the energy utility efficiency in 2000-2011. 4) In 2000-2011, the comprehensive energy intensity change and hydroelectricity energy intensity change were related to all industrial structures' change, and the influencing factors about structure of oil energy intensity change were more than those of coal energy intensity change; from the impact degree, agricultural proportion decreased exerted an positive and greater effect on lowering the energy intensity of comprehensive energy and hydroelectricity, and industrial one did on coal and natural gas. Some conclusions can be drawn as follows: the major way to promote the coordinated development of the industrial economy and energy consumption is to optimize the industrial structure by increasing the proportion of the tertiary industry and low energy consumption industrial sectors and to enhance the energy utility efficiency.