本期论文推荐

正本期论文"华北克拉通南缘约2.5Ga构造变质事件及意义"(曹正琦等),对于探讨华北克拉通太古宙晚期的构造演化具有重要意义.华北克拉通新太古代末期到早元古代早期构造-岩浆热事件的性质,是中国早前寒武纪地质学领域的重大科学问题和区域热点之一.华北克拉通约2.5Ga构造岩浆热事件广泛发育,但     

华北克拉通古元古代地质记录及其构造意义

华北克拉通上存在广泛的古元古代地质记录,尤其是构造岩石组合和同位素年龄资料,显示克拉通上可能存在多条古元古代的汇聚拼合带：如鄂尔多斯地块与华北东部-阴山地块之间的拼合造山带、华北东部地块与狼林地块之间的胶辽造山带以及华北克拉通北缘的安第斯型汇聚边界等。华北克拉通中部地区的古元古代锆百年龄数据统计,显示出2．3～24Ga、20～22Ga和18～1．95Ga三组年龄值,暗示华北克拉通古元古代可能存在两个演化阶段：其中古元古代末期（18～1．95Ga）的造山事件已得到了广泛认可,并认为-9全球Columbia超大陆汇聚事件相关;而2.3～2.4Ga、2.00～2.2Ga所代表的构造热事件的性质和意义尚不明确。我国古元古代末期有关陆块汇聚的构造热事件以及其后的裂解事件群和地层学记录,与新的国际前寒武纪地质年代表建议的古-中元古代界线一致,这将促进我国特别是古-中元古代的前寒武纪研究。     

“吕梁运动”新认识

吕梁运动(1.90~1.70 Ga)长久以来被认为是华北克拉通最终稳定固结的造山运动.事实上, 在古元古代末期华北克拉通以伸展-裂解构造为主, 表现为拗拉谷系发育、非造山岩浆活动(环斑花岗岩、斜长岩、辉长岩、花岗岩类及伟晶岩脉等)、大规模基性岩墙群侵位以及早期变质基底隆升或退变质构造热事件等.对已有的大量同位素年代学资料分析后证明, 这一时期的岩浆侵位与基底构造-热事件在时间上的分布具有多峰式特点, 克拉通基底隆升退变质事件滞后于岩浆侵位, 明显区别于造山带普遍记录的构造变形-变质-岩浆侵位的事件序列.古元古代末期构造格局的重新认识, 为我国克拉通在元古代超大陆中的再造模式提供了最基本的制约条件.      

中国早前寒武纪的地壳演化

以华北原地台为例，太古宙陆壳可能是由分散的陆核在涡旋构造机制的驱动下聚集而成的。早元古代伊始，板块构造机制控制了地壳演化的进程，出现不同性质的活动带同刚性地块并存的构造局。巨厚的火山-沉积建造，以其成岩环境和构造样式的多样性，宣告了一个新的地壳演化阶段的开始，明显具有太古宙克拉通基底的华北原地台、塔里木原地台和扬子原地台在它们的接触部位发育有早元在于代增生带，说明至少在太古宙末它们是互相分离的。而华夏古陆则是从早元古代以来逐渐向扬子原地台靠扰的。现代华北地台缘，早元古代建造近南北向的早期构造方位表明，它在     

华北克拉通南部早前寒武纪基底形成与演化

简要总结了华北克拉通南部鲁山地区、小秦岭地区、登封及中条山地区的早前寒武纪地质事件序列及其地质意义,并对各地区地质特征和变质演化特点进行对比。结合前人研究工作,初步探讨了华北克拉通南部早前寒武纪基底的演化特点、陆壳形成的主要时期和华北南部基底的构造区划等问题,提出几点认识:1)华北克拉通南部鲁山、中条山、小秦岭等地区均有2.7~2.9Ga岩石记录,以英云闪长质-奥长花岗质-花岗闪长质(TTG)岩石为主,它们共同构成华北南缘的古老结晶基底,并经历了新太古代晚期~2.5Ga构造-热事件,标志着华北克拉通南部在新太古代末期可能已经形成统一基底;2)华北克拉通南部主要的陆壳形成时期为中太古代晚期-新太古代,与全球其他主要克拉通一致,而古元古代早-中期则以地壳再循环为主;3)综合地质、地球化学等特点,将华北南部鲁山-小秦岭地区和中条山等地区划归为"南部古陆块",并提出该陆块呈现为一个大型的倾伏向斜构造,可能在新太古代晚期已经形成,其枢纽向南东倾斜。"南部古陆块"在新太古代末期与其它微陆块拼合,并发生了变质作用和陆壳的活化与再循环,共同指示新太古代晚期华北克拉通统一基底的形成。     

华北地台前寒武花岗岩类,陆壳定化与克拉通形成

通过华北前寒武幻花岗岩类的研究,提出英云闪长岩和奥长花岗岩代表不成熟陆壳组成,Ｔ１,Ｔ２Ｇ１Ｇ２代表半成熟陆壳组成,花岗闪长岩和花岗岩代表成熟陆壳组成,讨论了大陆根的形成与性质。识别出华北地台内１０个太古陆核。讨论了中太古代初始陆核,新太古代陆核;新太古代末两个微大陆尺度的陆核的形成;早元古代两个成熟陆核的构造拼合并形成华北克拉通。     

中国东部太古和元古活动带的构造和地球化学的发展

<正> 中国东部华北克拉通太古和早元古地壳以垂直增原为主,华北克拉通以外早元古地壳大范围地增生,其中、晚元古活动带则发生了地壳开会和水平增殖。它们分别具有各自的构造和地球化学的发展。 华北克拉通的太古宙地体主要由高级变质岩和花岗质岩石所构成。大部分地区仍可见到变质的上壳岩,如变质的双峰式火山岩及其火山碎屑岩、变粒岩、孔兹岩、大理岩和条带状铁建造等,形成了华北克拉通太古宙地体的自身岩石特征。已知太古宙的岩石时限为3.5—2.55Ga,其年代构造格架表现为大面积的晚太古岩石中包含了局部的3.5—2.9Ga的早     

华北地台前寒武花岗岩类、陆壳演化与克拉通形成

通过华北前寒武纪花岗岩类的研究,提出英云闪长岩和奥长花岗岩（Ｔ１Ｔ２）代表不成熟陆壳组成,Ｔ１Ｔ２Ｇ１Ｇ２代表半成熟陆壳组成,花岗闪长岩和花岗岩（Ｇ１Ｇ２）代表成熟陆壳组成。讨论了大陆根的形成与性质。识别出华北地台内１０个太古陆核。讨论了中太古代初始陆核、新太古代陆核;新太古代末两个微大陆尺度的陆核的形成;早元古代两个成熟陆核的构造拼合并形成华北克拉通     

查尔-奥列克明斯克基性杂岩体磷灰石含矿性的地质-地球物理判别标志

作为古地台太古代绿岩带类似物的阿尔丹-斯塔诺夫领域内的晚太古-早元古代的冰川槽构造,引起很多研究者的注意。该构造在平面上组成彼此分隔开的、近南北向较少近东西向的狭窄线状带,大多数冰川槽,被主要是陆源-火山铁-硅质建造和较少的碳酸盐-陆源建造的沉积物所填满(图1)。这些沉积物,在晚太古-早元古代时期,遭受过多阶段的褶皱作用和角闪岩相(较少绿片岩相)的进化变质作用。于早元古代,构造还遭     

东秦岭华北地台区岩浆活动的时代及地壳增长和再改造

同位素年龄资料表明，东秦岭华北地台区，先后在晚太古－早元古代（太华群火山岩）、早中元古代（熊耳群火山岩、张家坪片麻状花岗岩）、中元古晚期－晚元古早期（龙王幢碱性花岗岩）、晚元古代（陶湾群火山岩）、古生代（洛南粗面质火山岩）和中生代等时期，发生过岩浆活动。Ｓｍ－Ｎｄ同位素地质研究揭示，在上述几个时期岩浆活动中，晚太古代和早中元古代的岩浆活动与地壳增长有关，其它时期岩浆活动主要反映地壳自身的再改造。另外，就华北地块大陆地壳整体看，地壳的增长从早太古代至少持续到早元古代。东秦岭华北地台区，在中元古代早期仍然存在有壳－幔分异作用。     

中条山前寒武纪地壳演化

在中条山，古太古代—中太古代的涑水杂岩主要由ＴＴＧ岩套组成，另有一些表壳岩残体和基性岩墙群。以不整合覆于其上的新太古代绛县群由不成熟的浊积岩和双峰式火山岩组成，沉积于类似现代活动大陆边缘的构造环境，遭受了低绿片岩相至低角闪岩相的变质和强烈的变形。这些建造为原始大陆的组成部分。元古宙伊始，原始大陆破裂而形成原地台。在华北原地台的南缘，堆积了中条群等冒地斜建造，经受了早期从低绿片岩相到低角闪岩相的变质和以平卧褶皱为标志的强烈变形，指示收敛的古地热状态和陆壳的缩短，寓意华北原地台同扬子原地台曾经发生过焊接。中元古代开始，华北原地台南缘沿南北方向破裂，产生了以西阳河群大量安山岩喷发为标志的熊耳—汉高拗拉槽。距今１０００Ｍａ前，华北原地台逐渐同扬子原地台拼接，形成统一的大陆，接受中新元古代汝阳群、洛南群和震旦系等盖层沉积。     

Precambrian mafic magmatism in the Singhbhum craton,eastern India

The Singhbhum craton has a chequred history of mafic magmatism spanning from early Archaean to Proterozoic. However, lack of adequate isotopic age data put constraints on accurately establishing the history of spatial growth of the craton in which mafic magmatism played a very significant role. Mafic magmatism in the craton spreads from ca.3.3 Ga (oldest “enclaves” of orthoamphibolites) to about 0.1 Ga (‘Newer dolerite’ dyke swarms). Nearly contemporaneous amphibolite and intimately associated tonalitic orthogneiss may represent Archaean bimodal magmatism. The metabasic enclaves are appreciably enriched and do not fulfill the geochemical characteristics of worldwide known early Archaean (>3.0 Ga) mafic magmatism. The enclaves reveal compositional spectrum from siliceous high-magnesian basalt (SHMB) to andesite. However, the occurrence of minor depleted boninitic type within the assemblage has so far been overlooked. High magnesian basalt with boninitic character of Mesoarchaean age is also reported in association with supracrustals from southern fringe of the granitoid cratonic nucleus. The subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) below the craton is conjectured to have initiated during the early Archaean. Significantly, recurrence of depleted magma types in the craton is observed during the whole span of mafic igneous activity which has been vaguely related to “mantle heterogeneity”, although the alternative model of sequential mantle melting is also being explored. The Singhbhum craton includes the Banded Iron Formation (BIF) associated mafic lavas, MORB-like basic and komatiitic ultrabasic bimodal volcanism — documented as Dalma volcanics, Dhanjori lavas, and the Proterozoic Newer dolerite dykes. Three different types of REE fractionation patterns are observed in the BIF-associated mafic lavas. These are the REE unfractionated type is more depleted than N-MORB and some lavas with boninitic type of REE distribution. MORB-like basic and komatiitic ultrabasic (Dalma volcanics) are emplaced within the Proterozoic Singhbhum Basin (PSB). The vista of magmatism in the basin was controlled by a miniature spreading centre represented by the mid-basinal Dalma volcanic ridge. The volcano-sedimentary basinal domain of Dhanjori emerged at the interface of two subprovinces (viz. the mobile volcano-sedimentary belt of PSB and rigid granite platform) under unique stress environment related to extensional tectonic regime. Trace element distribution in Dhanjori lavas is remarkably similar to that in PSB minor intrusions and lavas (except a Ta spike in the latter). The Proterozoic Newer dolerite dykes within Singhbhum nucleus manifest an unusually wide spam of intrusive activity (ca 2100 Ma to 1100 Ma) and unexpectedly uniform mantle melting behaviour.     

华北克拉通破坏前的状态——对讨论华北克拉通破坏问题的一个建议

中生代华北克拉通破坏是目前引人关注的研究课题。鉴于目前一些文章在表达克拉通状态时引用的地质图件不准确,忽略了华北克拉通从古至今的不同阶段的演化,不能正确的表达克拉通在破坏之前或之后的状态,本文强调华北克拉通破坏前的状态是研究的重要基础。华北克拉通是经历过多期克拉通化形成的。     

华北克拉通北缘与盆地流体有关的若干矿床实例

与华南一样,在华北克拉通北缘及其增生带也有与盆地流体有关的矿床产出。矿床的生成总是与张裂型沉积盆地有关。根据基底大地构造性质和盆地动力学演化特征,可划分出两个与盆地流体有关的、特征各异的金属成矿省：1)华北克拉通北部元古代金．多金属成矿省,在克拉通内部,边缘元古代裂谷增生期生成沉积喷流型硫多金属矿床和沉积岩容矿的微细浸染型金矿床;2)大兴安岭中南段古生代锡．多金属成矿省,在克拉通北缘早／晚古生代增生带的张裂型沉积盆地内分别生成各具特征的铅锌/锡-多金属矿床。     

从哥伦比亚超大陆裂解事件论古/中元古代的界限

国际前寒武纪地层表中始终把古/中元古代的界线置于1. 6Ga,我国则一直将这一界线置于1. 8Ga。存在认识分歧的根本原因是对1. 8Ga前后时期地质事件及其性质的理解与认识的差异或偏颇。本文通过阐述1. 8～1. 6Ga期间地质事件及其性质,重点分析和讨论古/中元古代(界)界限的划分及相关地质事件的标志与意义。大量的地质资料显示,超大陆从1. 8～1. 75Ga开始裂解,形成一系列的陆内盆地,如北美(劳伦古陆)的Thelon盆地、澳大利亚北部的Leichhardt超级盆地、南美巴西圣弗兰西斯科盆地、华北南缘的熊耳裂谷盆地以及扬子地块西南缘的东川盆地等。在这些盆地形成的早期沉积了冲积扇相、河流相的碎屑岩,之后伴有较广泛的火山岩喷发,中晚期从河流相、湖相碎屑岩沉积过渡到浅海碳酸盐台地沉积,反映一个拉伸裂解的过程。在复原的哥伦比亚超大陆内,广泛分布有1. 78～1. 72Ga的非造山花岗岩,包括AMCG组合(斜长岩、纹长二长岩、紫苏花岗岩和花岗岩)、环斑花岗岩、A型花岗岩等,以及广泛分布的基性岩墙群。这些岩浆岩都反映了拉伸裂解的地球动力学背景。在1. 8～1. 6Ga,不论是沉积事件还是岩浆事件,绝大部分与超大陆的拉伸裂解有关,并未显示造山作用、大陆固结和克拉通化的特点,用固结纪来概括这一阶段地质事件的性质并不合适。哥伦比亚超大陆上的许多盆地在1. 6Ga左右经历了一次广泛的抬升,使沉积作用短时间间断,之后原有盆地继续发展,接受了更广泛的沉积,这种沉积作用可以一直延续到1. 4～1. 3Ga左右。与裂解有关的岩浆事件也以幕式方式从1. 78Ga一直断续持续到1. 4～1. 32Ga左右。从1. 8Ga(或1. 78Ga)到1. 4～1. 3Ga,不论是盆地的沉积事件还是与裂解有关的岩浆事件,基本是连续的。以1. 6Ga作为年代界线划分古/中元古代,人为地隔断了连续的沉积事件和岩浆事件,显然与"尽可能少地截断沉积作用、火成侵位或造山运动的主要序列"的前寒武纪地层划分原则相悖。连续的裂谷盆地沉积事件和非造山岩浆事件可以追溯到1. 8Ga(或1. 78Ga)。因此,我们建议将古/中元古代的界线置于1. 8Ga或1. 78Ga。考虑到裂谷作用的本质是在已有超大陆或克拉通的基础上盖层的发育过程,因此我们建议将～1. 8Ga或1. 78～1. 4Ga都归入盖层系。     

Lithospheric architecture and tectonic evolution of the Hudson Bay region

Hudson Bay conceals several fundamental tectonic elements of the North American continent, including most of the ca. 1.9–1.8 Ga Trans-Hudson orogen (THO) and the Paleozoic Hudson Bay basin. Formed due to a collision between two cratons, the THO is similar in scale and tectonic style to the modern Himalayan–Karakorum orogen. During collision, the lobate shape of the indentor (Superior craton) formed an orogenic template that, along with the smaller Sask craton, exerted a persistent influence on the tectonic evolution of the region resulting in anomalous preservation of juvenile Proterozoic crust. Extensive products of 2.72–2.68 Ga and 1.9–1.8 Ga episodes of subduction are preserved, but the spatial scale of corresponding domains increases by roughly an order-of-magnitude (to 1000 km, comparable to modern subduction environments) from the Archean to the Proterozoic. Based on analysis of gravity and magnetic data and published field evidence, we propose a new tectonic model in which Proterozoic crust in the southeastern third of Hudson Bay formed within an oceanic or marginal-basin setting proximal to the Superior craton, whereas the northwestern third is underlain by Archean crust. An intervening central belt truncates the southeastern domains and is interpreted to be a continental magmatic arc.Thick, cold and refractory lithosphere that underlies the Bay is well imaged by surface-wave studies and comprises a large component of the cratonic mantle keel beneath North America. The existence of an unusually thick mantle root indicates that subduction and plate collision during the Trans-Hudson orogeny were ‘root-preserving’ (if not ‘root-forming’) processes. Although the Hudson Bay basin is the largest by surface area of four major intracratonic basins in North America, it is also the shallowest. Available evidence suggests that basin subsidence may have been triggered by eclogitization of lower-crustal material. Compared to other basins of similar age in North America, the relatively stiff lithospheric root may have inhibited subsidence of the Hudson Bay basin.     

巴西陆上盆地类型及油气地质特征

基于巴西陆上沉积盆地基础地质条件,以石油地质理论为指导,运用分析、类比的方法划分盆地类型,并对各类盆地生储盖组合及油气成藏特征进行了研究。分析认为,南美地台经历复杂的构造演化,在巴西境内形成元古宙叠合、显生宙克拉通和中生代萎缩裂谷3大类盆地。元古宙盆地以地层年代久远、构造演化复杂、烃源岩热演化漫长为特征。显生宙克拉通盆地呈现“先断后坳”的演化特征,主体地层序列形成于古生代,有一套普遍发育且受侵入岩影响的烃源岩。中生代萎缩裂谷盆地基础及油气地质两方面均呈现断陷湖盆的特征。通过对巴西陆上盆地区域演化、类型划分、地层及构造特征、生储盖层和成藏特征等方面的探讨,可为中国海外油气区域优选提供一定参考。     

Provenance and source rocks of Riphean sandstones in the Uchur-Maya region (east Siberia): Implications of geochemical data and Sm-Nd isotopic systematics

As is shown based on geochemical data and Sm-Nd isotopic systematics, accumulation of sandy deposits in the Riphean protoplatform cover of the Southeast Siberian platform was controlled by influx of primary and recycled sedimentary material derived from magmatic and metamorphic complexes of the eastern Aldan shield in the course of denudation of the Early Proterozoic accretionary orogen formed prior to 1.9 Ga. First indications of endogenic material influx into sedimentary basins are established in the Totta Formation of the Middle Riphean. They mean contribution to sedimentation of material weathered and eroded from external recycled orogens and synsedimentary volcanics that marked commencement of rifting in the platform marginal zone. Provenances of this material were situated most likely to the east and southeast off the Yudoma-Maya trough.     

Metamorphic and tectonic domains of China

Abstract Ten metamorphic domains can be distinguished in China, comprising four cratonic, three intracratonic and three intercratonic domains. Each domain contains one or more metamorphic belts, each of which, in turn, contains a characteristic metamorphic facies or facies series that was formed during a distinct metamorphic epoch.
The metamorphic domains reflect the tectonic domains and tectonic evolution of China. Ancient continental nucleii in the North China and Tarim–Alxa cratons were probably unified with the Yangtze craton during the Early Proterozoic to form the China Platform. Widespread greenschist facies metamorphism, during the Middle and Late Proterozoic, accompanied by glaucophane–greenschist facies metamorphism, represents a rifting and closure event in the China Platform; a second rifting and closure event in the China Platform occurred during the Caledonian. The China and Siberian platforms were closed during the Hercynian to form the Eurasian Continent. Closure of the ancient Tethys Ocean occurred in the Indosinian epoch, and subduction and collision within Xizang (Tibet) and Taiwan occurred during Mesozoic–Cenozoic time.
The distribution in time of types of metamorphism in China suggests cyclical changes of metamorphism known as the Archaean, Proterozoic and Phanerozoic megacycles. Each megacycle since the Archaean consists of a change from progressive, low- to intermediate-grade metamorphism to lower grade, greenschist metamorphism that was superimposed on a general trend in which high-grade metamorphism became progressively less important with time. The change in metamorphic megacycles shows a general secular decrease in regional heat supply during metamorphism punctuated by episodic high-grade, progressive metamorphism within orogenic belts.