共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 484 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
动态GPS精密差分定位要求基准站和流动点在每个历元均有同步观测数据.针对个别历元流动点有观测数据,基准点没有观测数据的情况,提出了用流动点历元间差分数据作为观测值,以相近历元与基准点存在同步观测数据的流动点作为已知点,内插流动点坐标的算法,推导了相应公式,通过算例验证了算法的正确生和可行性.结果表明,内插精度与基准点存在同步观测数据时流动点与基准点差分定位精度相当. 相似文献
4.
基于误差传播定律,考虑参数r误差影响,推导了线元内插点的精度计算公式,讨论内插点精度对线元误差带的影响,并对影响的结果进行了分析,得到了一些有益的结论. 相似文献
5.
基于随机过程模型导出了TIN DEM线性内插的随机过程模型,给出了不规则随机空间三角形的不确定性描述,讨论了TIN节点误差在线性内插中的传播问题。通过理论推导和实际算例,得到了TIN DEM线性内插点的点位方差和误差椭球半轴的解析表达式、线性内插精度最高点坐标的解析表达式,该结论与三角形的形状无关;对DEM线性外推导致精度急剧下降的必然性结论进行了理论证明;得到TIN线性内插的平均点位方差解析式,从理论上说明了本文结论的有效性。 相似文献
6.
黄谟涛 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》1988,(2)
本文以吕言的三次曲面函数内插模型为基础,推出一套计算不规则水体断面面积及其体积的封闭公式,并用实例加以验证。最后从另一侧面探讨了多面函数模型的内插精度问题。本文得到的公式同样适用于工程上的土方量及断面面积的计算。 相似文献
7.
基于四点内插方法建立了选点内插模型,讨论了内插过程中的两种定权方法;利用4个IGS跟踪站连续3 d的实测数据,采用单频精密单点定位方法,以坐标外符合误差为标准比较分析了两种内插模型和两种定权方法的效果.实验结果表明:两种内插模型和两种定权方法都是有效的,应用于单频精密单点定位时能够使点坐标外符合精度达到厘米级.最后,针对单频精密单点定位中电离层延迟误差的处理问题提出了具有参考性的建议. 相似文献
8.
基于立体相机成像模型并结合相机参数对嫦娥三号导航相机3维测图能力进行分析,利用摄影测量原理和误差传播定律对巡视器30 m范围内的DEM精度进行了理论分析,推导出导航相机立体影像获得的采样点精度公式,并绘制了DEM的平面精度图和高程精度图;同时使用多线程技术开发了基于导航相机立体影像的地形快速重建算法,利用多线程技术完成影像的特征匹配和密集匹配,并通过分块内插生成DEM。该技术应用于嫦娥三号任务中,有力地支持了嫦娥三号遥操作路径规划相关任务。 相似文献
9.
根据勒让德函数理论的基本递推公式和基本性质,详细推导了在重力梯度调和分析中出现的一组特殊定积分的递推公式;并且指出,这组递推公式对于物理大地测量的调和分析理论也具有一定的价值. 相似文献
10.
GIS中直线元内插点精度及对误差带的影响 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
基于误差传播定律,考虑参数r误差影响,推导了线元内插点的精度计算公式,讨论内插点精度对线元误差带的影响,并对影响的结果进行了分析,得到了一些有益的结论。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
祝国瑞 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》1989,(4)
在评价地图的质量时,如果没有大比例尺地图相对照,传统上只能根据该图使用的地图投影、地图符号的规格化程度、制图时间、制图单位等标志间接推断,这种推断是极不可靠的。本文提出用要素分布的数学模型进行推断,并以河流为例,举出推断所用的数学模型及其使用方法,最后用实例验证,结果表明这种推断方法是可靠的。 相似文献
14.
Despeckling of TerraSAR-X Data Using Second-Generation Wavelets 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
15.
16.
为了实现基于多源WFS服务要素层次的语义检索,提出了一个要素本体的五元模型。在此框架下,研究了要素本体的自动构建方法,形式化定义了要素的空间关系,并扩展了逻辑关系以及空间关系的推理规则来实现要素层次的联合推理检索,并给出了联合规则推理的要素语义检索算法。实例证明,本文方法对多源WFS的语义查询具有实际的可行性,为多源WFS服务要素的语义检索提供了一个新的方法。 相似文献
17.
Stephen V. Stehman 《Journal of Geographical Systems》2006,8(2):209-226
Assessing thematic map accuracy is a special type of map comparison that is frequently applied to remote sensing classification problems. For map comparisons in the accuracy assessment setting, one map represents the classified output and the other map represents the true or “reference” condition. Several articles in this special issue describe state-of-the-art map comparison analysis tools that could serve to quantify accuracy of a single map. However, accuracy assessment objectives generally extend beyond describing accuracy of a single map to comparing accuracy of several maps. Consequently, interest focuses on comparing map comparison measures when these measures are used to represent accuracy. The virtual workshop emphasizes the analysis component of map comparisons, but it is also important to examine the underlying study designs generating the data input into these analyses. The study designs for accuracy comparisons implemented in remote sensing practice often investigate only a single test site, thus limiting our ability to generalize the results of these accuracy comparisons. Map accuracy comparison studies can be designed to provide stronger generalizations by incorporating experimental design principles such as replication and blocking, and identifying an experimental unit appropriate for the application. It is also important to recognize the role of statistical hypothesis testing and inference for different objectives that motivate map accuracy comparisons. Deciding which of two maps to use for a particular site can be addressed by enumerative inference and does not require hypothesis testing. For the objective of a more general comparison of classification procedures, analytic inference is appropriate and hypothesis testing plays a more prominent role. 相似文献
18.
本文根据地图要素的形态分离结果,通过相互间几何关系与拓扑关系的建立,以图论为基础,重点论述了水深符号的识别、等深线值的自动标注和形态分离与识别结果的推理验证。 相似文献
19.
Milad Janalipour 《International Journal of Digital Earth》2018,11(12):1241-1268
Building damage maps after disasters can help us to better manage the rescue operations. Researchers have used Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data for extracting the building damage maps. For producing building damage maps from LiDAR data in a rapid manner, it is necessary to understand the effectiveness of features and classifiers. However, there is no comprehensive study on the performance of features and classifiers in identifying damaged areas. In this study, the effectiveness of three texture extraction methods and three fuzzy systems for producing the building damage maps was investigated. In the proposed method, at first, a pre-processing stage was utilized to apply essential processes on post-event LiDAR data. Second, textural features were extracted from the pre-processed LiDAR data. Third, fuzzy inference systems were generated to make a relation between the extracted textural features of buildings and their damage extents. The proposed method was tested across three areas over the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Three building damage maps with overall accuracies of 75.0%, 78.1% and 61.4% were achieved. Based on outcomes, the fuzzy inference systems were stronger than random forest, bagging, boosting and support vector machine classifiers for detecting damaged buildings. 相似文献
20.