天球和地球历书原点

国际天球参考系的使用、观测精度的提高和方法的改善要求采用与地球轨道运动无关的运动赤道上的起算点，Guinot提出的非旋转原点可作为这样一种选择。非旋转原点依赖于天球参考极。IAU决定从2003年起采用天球中间极作为天球参考极。非旋转原点在天球参考系的使用，可给出在天球中间极赤道上的天球历书原点，非旋转原点在地球参考系的使用，可给出在天球中间极赤道上的地球历书原点。回顾了非旋转原点的概念、以历书原点为参考的天球参考系和地球参考系的坐标变换，经出了在微角秒精度下天球参考极的坐标和历书原点的位置，讨论了采用历书原点对测定UT1的影响，指出当岁差章动模型、天极补偿、分点改正得到改善时，基于历书原点的UT1定义不需要更改，从而保证了UT1的连续。     

关于天球历书极的定义

本文讨论了1980 IAU章动理论中关于天球历书极的定义。由于液核地球具有近周日自由极移,所以不能认为天球历书极对于地固坐标系没有近周日运动。建议把天球历书极的定义改为: “参考极的选择使得这个极相对于空固坐标系没有自由章动,对于地固坐标系没有日月极移;即它是消除日月极移的地球角动量极。”     

新参考系的引入对天体测量学的影响

由于观测、参考架、模型、时间尺度精度的不断提高和完善，国际天球参考系(ICRS)被引入使用，IAU2000年大会决定从2003年起采用新的天球中介极(CIP)、新的天球中介原点(CIO)、新的岁差一章动模型和新的UTI定义等，并定义了新的中介的运动参考架，由此给天体测量学带来很大的影响，天体测量学的内容和实践发生了许多重要的变化。据此，对天体测量学的术语、概念和定义的变化作了描述，并讨论了变化的原因和对天体测量学的影响。新的一套天体测量理论和方法正在变更之中，我们应及时跟上这个领域的发展步伐。     

非刚体地球的受迫章动奥波策项和倾斜模

讨论了非刚体地球受迫章动奥波策项与简正模表达式中倾斜模的关系。结果表明天球历书极章动中倾斜振项对应于角动量极的章动,在球历书极章动与角动量极的章动奥波策项之和。同时还给出了岁差速率与自转极的章动奥波策项间的数学关系。     

最新规范的参考系及有关问题

在简要阐明参考系、参考架及其历史重大进程的基础上,对几种重要的、最新规范的参考系/参考架(质心天球参考系和地心天球参考系、国际天球参考系、国际地球参考系、太阳系动力学参考系等)的定义、实现和特点作了评述和分析,并对最新规范中与参考系、参考架有关的某些新概念的定义和新模式的应用(自2003年开始贯彻),如:天球中介极(CIP)、天球历书原点(CEO)、地球历书原点(TEO)、地球自转角的新定义、岁差-章动新模式的应用,作了阐述和讨论。     

地球动力学扁率及其与岁差章动的关系

由岁差常数求得的日月岁差是天文学的重要参数之一,它和地球动力学扁率相联系。地球动力学扁率在章动理论的计算中也是一个重要的物理量。介绍了由不同的观测方法和模型给出的地球动力扁率值,并讨论了它也岁差的关系和对章动计算的影响。在刚体地球章动振幅的计算中,地球动力学扁率值起着尺度因子的作用,要改善刚体地球章动振幅的计算,需要修改目前的黄经总岁差值。非刚体地球章动的转换函数中所采用的简正模和常数都直接或间接地依赖地球动力学扁率值。在IAU1980章动理论中,计算刚体地球章动振幅所使用的地球动力学扁率值计算转换函数中简正模频率和常数所使用的地球动力学扁率值并不一致。随着观测和计算精度的提高,地球动力学扁率值的不一致将影响章动振幅的计算。在建立刚体地球章地动理论中,如何解释地球动力学扁率值的差异,如何选取地球动力学扁率值,还有待进一步的研究。     

关于章动序列计算中的地球动力学扁率的取值

刚体地球章动序列和非刚体地球章动的转换函数都和地球动力学扁率有关。ＩＡＵ１９８０章动理论中采用了一个不一致的地球动力学扁率值,从而影响了章动振幅的计算。本文介绍了章动序列计算中地球动力学扁率的取值。由地球模型１０６６Ａ或ＰＲＥＭ得到的地球动力学扁率值比由岁差观测得到的约小１％,并且不可靠。当考虑体静力学平衡被破坏时新的地球物理模型,可得到与岁差常数相一致的地球动力学扁率值。地球动力学扁率值Ｈ＝０．     

主章动常数和对它的天文实测

本文列举了最近以来,光学天文、VLBI和LLR等技术对主章动常数的测量结果,结果表明对国际天文学联合会(IAU)在1982年通过的1980 IAU章动理论应予以修正。文中强调了现代天文实测工作应该在地球模型和章动理论的研究中起到更大的作用;还讨论了在实际进行主章动常数测量工作时应该注意的一些问题。     

用Hamilton方法计算弹性地球的章动序列

本文利用Hamilton方法研究弹性地球自转运动，采用地球模型PREM参数，给出了形状轴的章动序列．结果表明我们的方法是可行的，计算是可靠的．弹性地幔对地球章动的影响仅在毫角秒量级上，它相对液核对地球竟动的影响要小得多．     

世界时的概念还需要吗

地球自转速度的不均匀性的存在使传统的世界时的概念变得复杂、模糊和不精确。引进赤道上的无旋转原点代替历书春分点并不能使上述问题得到解决。世界时曾在三个方面起过作用：（1）提供一个均匀的时间尺度；（2）是描述地球参考系和天球参考系之间关系的参数之一；（4）为协调时UTC跳秒提供依据。这里的第一项作用早已被国际原子时尺度所取代。第二项作用可以由恒星时更直接更简单地实现。第三项作用可通过恒星时与“坐标恒星时”之差的测定来实现。因此，作者认为，世界时这一传统概念已无继续存在的必要，长期以来由于世界时的概念所引进的各种矛盾只有在抛弃世界时的概念后才能和彻底解决。     

Accurate analytical nutation series

In this letter we present the first accurate analytical nutation series, deduced from the Hamiltonian theory by the authors. They provide the highest accuracy ever obtained by any analytical nutation series, since the deviation in CEP (celestial ephemeris pole) offsets with respect to that of the IERS Conventions 1996 is kept below 1 mas in the time domain, in spite of still lacking ocanic corrections.     

Forced nutations of a two-layer Earth model

In this paper we present a theory of the Earth rotation for a model composed of an inelastic mantle and a liquid core, including the dissipation in the core–mantle boundary (CMB). The main features of the theory are: (i) to be Hamiltonian, therefore the computation of some complex inner torques can be avoided; (ii) to be self-consistent and non-dependent on a previous rigid Earth theory, so there is no need to use transfer functions; (iii) to be analytical, the solution being derived by perturbation methods. Numerical nutation series deduced from the theory are compared with the IERS 96 empirical series, an accuracy better than 0.8 mas in providing celestial ephemeris pole (CEP) offsets .     

Earth rotation in the hipparcos reference frame

New determination of the Earth orientation parameters (EOP), based on optical astrometry observations since the beginning of the century, is now under preparation by the Working group established by Commission 19 of the IAU. The Hipparcos catalog is to define the celestial reference frame in which the new series of EOP are to be described, The novelties of the prepared solution are the higher resolution (5 days) and more parameters estimated from the solution (celestial pole offsets, rheological parameters of the Earth, certain instrumental constants). The mathematical model of the solution is described, and the results based on the observations made with 46 instruments at 29 observatories and a preliminary Hipparcos catalog are presented.     

An Abridged Model of the Precession–Nutation of the Celestial Pole

Precise astrometric observations show that significant systematic differences of the order of 10 milliarcseconds (mas) exist between the observed position of the celestial pole in the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) and the position determined using the International Astronomical Union (IAU) 1976 Precession (Lieske et al., 1977) and the IAU 1980 Nutation Theory (Seidelmann, 1982). The International Earth Rotation Service routinely publishes these 'celestial pole offsets', and the IERS Conventions (McCarthy, 1996) recommends a procedure to account for these errors. The IAU, at its General Assembly in 2000, adopted a new precession/nutation model (Mathews et al., 2002). This model, designated IAU2000A, which includes nearly 1400 terms, provides the direction of the celestial pole in the ICRF with an accuracy of ±0.1 mas. Users requiring accuracy no better than 1 mas, however, may not require the full model, particularly if computational time or storage are issues. Consequently, the IAU also adopted an abridged procedure designated IAU2000B to model the celestial pole motion with an accuracy that does not result in a difference greater than 1 mas with respect to that of the IAU2000A model. That IAU2000B model, presented here, is shown to have the required accuracy for a period of more than 50 years from 1995 to 2050.     

Coriolis forces in numerical integration of satellite orbits,and absolute reference system

The reference system defined by Veis and currently used for computing satellite orbits is not sufficiently accurate for some scientific applications, considering the new accuracy of laser data. We have therefore defined another orbital reference system with associated apparent forces. The reference system chosen is the mean celestial system 1970.0. The motion of a satellite is numerically integrated in the instantaneous celestial system (sideral system), taking into account all the complementary forces due to precession and nutation. The complete set of formulas is given here and has been introduced in a differential orbital improvement program.     

Dynamics of the Earth’s core from VLBI observations

The Earth’s rotation is accompanied by free circadian oscillations of its liquid core in the inner cavity of the lower mantle, which perturb the angular momentum of the entire Earth and produce an additional free nutation of the celestial pole called free core nutation (FCN). Since this nutation causes resonances in the diurnal tides and in the expansions of luni—solar nutation, its study, especially an improvement of the FCN period, is of fundamental importance for the theory of the Earth’s rotation. We have determined the FCN parameters from a joint analysis of equidistant series of coordinates of the celestial pole obtained from the combined processing of VLBI observations on global networks of stations for the interval 1984.0–2008.4 by IERS (International Earth Rotation and Reference System Service, Paris, France) and NEOS (National Earth Orientation Service, Washington, USA). Applying a moving least-squares filter (MLSF) to these data has shown that the FCN period averaged over this time interval differs significantly from the theoretical one and its phase varies over a wide range. Using the mean quadratic collocation (MQC) method, we have obtained a new, more accurate stochastic FCN model. Its analysis by the envelope method has revealed long-term linear phase trends, calling into question not only the adopted FCN period but also its stability and, hence, the stability of the resonant effects in the Earth’s luni—solar nutation.     

IERS1996规范在参考系方面的改进

对ＩＥＲＳ１９９６规范中有关参考系方面作了简单而系统的介绍，重点叙述了与ＩＥＲＳ１９９２标准相比ＩＥＲＳ１９９６规范在参考系方面的主要改进：天球参考架中的基本源从５７颗增加到２３６颗；动力学参考架采用ＪＰＬ ＤＥ４０３／ＬＥ４０３历表代替ＤＥ２００／ＬＥ２００历表；采用ＮＵＶＥＬ ＮＮＲ－１Ａ板块运动模型代替ＮＵＶＥＬ ＮＮＲ－１模型；变更了９个基本常数值；给出了天极坐标的观测和理论间差的经验模型