中国区域SST卫星重力场模型精度分析

通过比较最新SST地球重力场模型EIGEN_GRACE02S、GGM02S和EGM96模型在中国区域与WDM94模型重力异常残差的差异，分析差异产生的原因及分布，研究新一代卫星重力方法对于提高区域重力场模型精度的潜力以及存在的问题。结果证明，卫星跟踪卫星方法对于现有模型中低阶部分有明显改善。     

Accuracy analysis for SST gravity field model in China

IntroductionThe high-accauary and high-resolution Earth’sgravity field can be recovered with satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) technique , the preciseintersatellite tracking technique . The SSTtech-nique has been studied since 1960’s . The modesof S…     

用GRACE星间速度恢复地球重力场

本文首先给出了用星间速度恢复地球重力场的数学模型,然后用GRACE卫星30天的星间速度观测值计算了一个100阶的地球重力场模型DQM2006S2。为了对这一模型的精度进行评述,将它与EGM 96,EIGEN-CHAMP03S和GGM01S3个地球重力场模型作了比较,并用这一模型计算了高程异常与GPS/水准实际观测值进行了比较,结果表明:DQM2006S2模型精度优于EGM 96和EIGEN-CHAMP03S模型精度,但是不及GGM01S模型精度。精度不及GGM01S的原因是GGM01S模型使用了111天的星间速度数据,其数据量约为DQM2006S2模型使用数据量的4倍。     

现有SST重力场模型的比较研究

分析了最新的卫星跟踪卫星（satellite—to—satellite tracking，SST）地球重力场模型EIGEN系列和GGM系列在欧洲大陆部分与GPM98C模型重力场异常残差的差异，研究了新一代卫星重力方法对于提高区域重力场模型精度的潜力以及存在的问题。比较结果说明，SST重力场模型的较高阶部分精度不理想，而在中低阶部分，SST模型表现出在原有经典重力场模型中并未包含的信息。     

Comparison of present SST gravity field models

Taking the main land of Europe as the region to be studied, the potential of the new satellite gravity technique: satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) and improving the accuracy of regional gravity field model with the SST models are investigated. The drawbacks of these models are discussed. With GPM98C as the reference, the gravity anomaly residuals of several other models, the latest SST global gravity field models (EIGEN series and GGM series), were computed and compared. The results of the comparison show that in the selected region, some systematic errors with periodical properties exist in the EIGEN and GGM's S series models in the high degree and order. Some information that was not shown in the classic gravity models is detected in the low and middle degree and order of EIGEN and GGM's S series models. At last, the effective maximum degrees and orders of SST models are suggested.     

Earth gravity field recovered from CHAMP science orbit and accelerometer data

The earth gravity field model CDS01S of degree and order 36 has been recovered from the post processed Science Orbits and on-board accelerometer data of GFZ's CHAMP satellite. The model resolves the geoid with an accuracy of better than 4 cm at a resolution of 700 km half-wavelength. By using the degree difference variances of geopotential coefficients to compare the model CDS01S with EIGEN3P, EIGEN1S and EGM96, the result indicates that the coefficients of CDS01S are most close to those of EIGEN3P. The result of the comparison between the accuracies of geopotential coefficients in the above models, indicates that the accuracy of coefficients in CDS01S is higher than that in EGM96. The geoid undulations of CDS01S and GGM01C up to 30 degrees are calculated and the standard deviation is 4. 7 cm between them.     

Earth gravity field recovered from CHAMP science orbit and accelerometer data

IntroductionSince the launch of man-made satellite early in1957 ,the research for satellite gravity has beentaken a wide attentioninfield of geodesy .Early ,the ground-based satellite tracking has providedan observational data set which has been used tode…     

Comparison of present SST gravity field models

IntroductionSince 2000 , with the launch of CHAMP satellite,several series of high-accuracy and high-resolutionstatic Earth’s gravityfield models have been createdbased on aboundent SST data. With these models ,the research in solid geophysics ,oceangraphy,andgeodesy can be promoted greatly[1].In this paper ,the SSTgravity models’accura-cyin various frequently domainis studied.First-ly,the difference among these models is compu-ted and compared,and then their accuracyis an-alyzed. Fina…     

利用CHAMP科学轨道数据和星载加速度计数据反演地球重力场

基于卫星动力学理论,采用德国地球科学中心GFZ提供的CHAMP精密轨道数据和星载加速度计数据,反演了36阶地球重力场模型CDS01S。用不同模型之间的位系数差比较模型CDS01S、EIGEN3P、EIGEN1S及EGM96,表明CDS01S模型的位系数最接近于EIGEN3P;比较上述几种模型的位系数精度,表明CDS01S模型的位系数精度高于EGM96;用CDS01S和GGM01C的前30阶位系数分别计算全球2°×2°网格的大地水准面起伏,两者之间的标准偏差为4.7 cm。     

利用GRACE轨道和加速度数据恢复地球重力场

本文基于高低卫卫跟踪的模式，用积分方法研究了不同重力场模型对于轨道的影响，并用3个月的GRACE轨道数据计算了新的60阶地球重力场模型，为了分析其精度，与EGM96和EIGENIS作了比较．结果表明新模型在40阶前更接近GGM02C模型。     

GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE

A new generation of Earth gravity field models called GGM02 are derived using approximately 14 months of data spanning from April 2002 to December 2003 from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE). Relative to the preceding generation, GGM01, there have been improvements to the data products, the gravity estimation methods and the background models. Based on the calibrated covariances, GGM02 (both the GRACE-only model GGM02S and the combination model GGM02C) represents an improvement greater than a factor of two over the previous GGM01 models. Error estimates indicate a cumulative error less than 1 cm geoid height to spherical harmonic degree 70, which can be said to have met the GRACE minimum mission goals. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at     

改进的能量守恒方法及其在CHAMP重力场恢复中的应用(英文)

An efficient method for gravity field determination from CHAMP orbits and accelerometer data is referred to as the energy balance approach. A new CHAMP gravity field recovery strategy based on the improved energy balance approach IS developed in this paper. The method simultaneously solves the spherical harmonic coefficients, daily Integration constant, scale and bias parameters. Two 60 degree and order gravitational potential models, XISM-CHAMPO1S from the classical energy balance approach, and XISM-CHAMPO2S from the improved energy balance, are determined using about one year＇s worth of CHAMP kinematic orbits from TUM and accelerometer data from GFZ. Comparisons among XISM-CHAMPO1S, XISM-CHAMPO2S, EIGEN-CGO3C, EIGEN-CHAMPO3S, EIGEN2, ENIGNIS and EGM96 are made. The results show that the XISM-CHAMPO2S model is more accurate than EGM96, EIGENIS, EIGEN2 and XISM-CHAMPO1S at the same degree and order, and has almost the same accuracy as EIGEN-CHAMPO3S.     

基于能量守恒方法恢复CHAMP重力场模型

介绍了基于能量守恒定律恢复地球重力场模型的基本原理和算法.指出了CHAMP加速度计数据存在的问题,提出了整体求解尺度因子、偏差参数和偏差漂移的数学模型及差分算法.利用2002年1月的CHAMP快速科学轨道数据和加速度计数据计算出了50 × 50地球重力场模型XISM02.将该模型与EGM96,GRIM5C1,EIGEN1S,EIGEN2模型进行了比较,并用北极实测重力数据对上述模型进行了检验.结果表明:XISM02模型在北极地区精度与EIGEN1S,EIGEN2相当.     

联合卫星重力和卫星测高数据确定稳态海洋动力地形

新一代卫星重力探测任务GRACE大大提高了地球重力场模型中长波分量的精度,使得联合卫星测高平均海面分离更精细稳态海洋动力地形成为可能。本文利用T/P(1994年~2003年)和JASON-1(2003年~2005年)卫星测高数据确定了全球30′×30′平均海面高;基于重力场模型WHU-GM-05,计算得到对应于海面高的GRACE海洋大地水准面格网值;利用“移去-恢复法”和高斯滤波求得全球稳态海面地形。与EGM96、R io05、ECCO和GGM02模型进行比较,检验结果表明GRACE任务有效的改善了海洋大地水准面的精度,使得稳态海洋动力地形能够呈现更多细部。     

利用先验重力场模型对GOCE卫星重力梯度观测值进行校准分析

GOCE卫星任务搭载了高灵敏度的重力梯度仪,其观测值用于恢复高精度高分辨率的地球重力场。本文利用EIGEN-5C、EGM2008、GOTIM3、GGM03S高精度全球重力场模型,确定了GOCE引力梯度张量的对角分量观测值(Vxx、Vyy、Vzz)的校准参数,分析了比例因子的稳定性,并讨论了相同模型不同阶次、同阶次不同模型以及是否估计漂移参数对比例因子、偏差参数及校准观测值的影响。研究表明比例因子的稳定性在10-4的量级,利用250阶的EIGEN-5C模型和EGM2008模型校准得到观测值的差异小于10-4 E,远远小于观测误差,以1d为周期估计校准参数时,是否估计漂移对校准结果的影响达到0.4E。同时,校准前后观测值差异的频谱说明校准过程主要影响Vxx、Vyy、Vzz观测值的低频部分,即来自先验重力场模型的中低(150)阶次,考虑到GOCE引力梯度的观测频带,校准后的观测值可用于恢复中高频的重力场信号。     

联合EGM2008模型重力异常和GOCE观测数据构建超高阶地球重力场模型SGG-UGM-1

本文研究了联合卫星观测数据和重力异常数据确定超高阶重力场模型的理论方法,并使用EGM2008模型重力异常和GOCE（gravity field and ocean circulation explorer）观测数据构建了重力场模型SGG-UGM-1。重点研究了由球面格网重力异常快速构建超高阶重力场模型的块对角最小二乘方法,将OpenMP技术引入到块对角最小二乘中以提高计算效率,并基于模拟数据验证了方法及算法和软件模块的正确性。采用本文制定的联合解算策略,利用GOCE重力卫星观测数据构建的220阶次法方程和EGM2008模型重力异常构建的2159阶次块对角法方程,联合求解了2159阶次的重力场模型SGG-UGM-1。将SGG-UGM-1与EGM2008、EIGEN-6C2、EIGEN-6C4等超高阶模型在频谱域内进行了比较分析,结果表明SGG-UGM-1相对参考模型的系数误差较小,且在220阶次内的系数精度相比EGM2008模型有了提高。采用中国与美国的GPS/水准数据和毛乌素测区的航空重力观测数据对这些模型进行了外符合精度的检验。检核结果表明,在中国区域,SGG-UGM-1模型大地水准面的精度在EIGEN-6C2和EIGEN-6C4两个模型之间,优于GOSG-EGM模型和EGM2008模型,与美国区域几个模型的精度相当。利用毛乌素测区的航空重力数据对几个模型进行了检核,结果表明SGG-UGM-1模型计算的重力扰动精度与EGM2008、EIGEN-6C4模型相当,优于GOSG-EGM模型和EIGEN-6C2模型。     

使用能量守恒方法恢复CHAMP地球重力场

本文探讨了基于能量守恒方法利用CHAMP卫星精密星历和加速度数据恢复地球重力场模型的原理和方法。给出了地心惯性系下顾及地球自转和非保守力能量损耗的能量守恒方程,并且对日、月摄动位与引潮力附加位的计算方法作了相应的分析,同时介绍了加速度数据的处理方法。基于能量守恒方法,利用2002年1-2月、7-8月和11-12月三个不同时期共180天的CHAMP卫星精密星历和加速度数据恢复了三组50阶次的地球重力场模型GFM01、GFM02和GFM03,并将这些模型与EGM 96重力场模型和GFZ公布的EIGEN-CG01C重力场模型进行比较。结果表明:能量守恒方法恢复的GFM系列模型与EGM 96重力场模型及EIGEN-CG01C重力场模型在低阶位系数上均有较好的一致,但与EIGEN-CG01C模型有更好的一致。这说明了CHAMP卫星对地球中、长波重力场的敏感性,也说明了能量守恒方法恢复低阶地球重力场位系数的有效性。     

Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity,vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights

Recently, four global geopotential models (GGMs) were computed and released based on the first 2 months of data collected by the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) dedicated satellite gravity field mission. Given that GOCE is a technologically complex mission and different processing strategies were applied to real space-collected GOCE data for the first time, evaluation of the new models is an important aspect. As a first assessment strategy, we use terrestrial gravity data over Switzerland and Australia and astrogeodetic vertical deflections over Europe and Australia as ground-truth data sets for GOCE model evaluation. We apply a spectral enhancement method (SEM) to the truncated GOCE GGMs to make their spectral content more comparable with the terrestrial data. The SEM utilises the high-degree bands of EGM2008 and residual terrain model data as a data source to widely bridge the spectral gap between the satellite and terrestrial data. Analysis of root mean square (RMS) errors is carried out as a function of (i) the GOCE GGM expansion degree and (ii) the four different GOCE GGMs. The RMS curves are also compared against those from EGM2008 and GRACE-based GGMs. As a second assessment strategy, we compare global grids of GOCE GGM and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights. In connection with EGM2008 error estimates, this allows location of regions where GOCE is likely to deliver improved knowledge on the Earth’s gravity field. Our ground truth data sets, together with the EGM2008 quasigeoid comparisons, signal clear improvements in the spectral band ~160–165 to ~180–185 in terms of spherical harmonic degrees for the GOCE-based GGMs, fairly independently of the individual GOCE model used. The results from both assessments together provide strong evidence that the first 2 months of GOCE observations improve the knowledge of the Earth’s static gravity field at spatial scales between ~125 and ~110 km, particularly over parts of Asia, Africa, South America and Antarctica, in comparison with the pre-GOCE-era.     

超高阶地球位模型的计算与分析

全球重力场模型是当今物理大地测量学最为活跃的研究领域之一。本文基于目前国内外最新的重力场模型理论研究成果 ,提出了利用中国地区细部数据和全球卫星测高 2′× 2′网格重力异常扩展超高阶位模型的计算方法 ,详细讨论了数值解算过程中的稳定性和可靠性问题。以 EGM96和 GPM98CR模型作为参考模型 ,在全球意义上分别解算得到 MOD99a( 360阶 )、MOD99b( 72 0阶 )和 MOD99c/d( 1 80 0阶 ) ,将系列模型 MOD99a/b/c/d同中国地区 72个 GPS水准大地水准面和全球海洋 1 2个地区的卫星测高大地水准面进行了比较 ,并通过功率谱分析方法检验了 4组模型的有效性和可靠性。     

基于方差分量估计的CHAMP重力场恢复方法

基于德国慕尼黑技术大学(TUM)提供的100 d的CHAMP卫星几何法轨道和GFZ提供的加速度计数据,计算出了50×50阶地球重力场模型XISM-CHAMP01,并与EIGEN-CG03C、EIGEN-CHAMP03S、EIGEN2、EIGEN1S、EGM96模型进行了比较。结果表明,XISM-CHAMP01模型精度明显优于相同阶次EGM96模型和EIGEN1S模型,并与EIGEN2模型精度相当。