Preservation of borings: contrasting examples from the type Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous), southern Limburg,the Netherlands |
| |
Authors: | Stephen K. Donovan Natasja den Ouden John W.M. Jagt |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands;2. Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, De Bosquetplain 6-7, 6211 KJ Maastricht, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | The taphonomy of trace fossils and their substrates remains an understudied facet of sedimentary geology. Contrary to common prejudice, trace fossils are not invariably preserved in situ, but may be exhumed and reworked following lithification. The trace fossils most commonly found ex situ are borings in mobile shelly substrates. Two notable, but contrasting, examples of post-mortem transport of borings are described from the Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) of southern Limburg, the Netherlands. A long, unusually straight and complete calcareous tube assigned to Teredolites longissimus Kelly and Bromley is an organically secreted internal mould, produced by a teredinid or pholadid bivalve boring in wood and lining their tube. Strictly, this is part of the body fossil of the producing bivalve, but it is also an organically generated internal mould of the boring. A flint steinkern of a right valve of Crassatella bosquetiana d’Orbigny preserves a suite of silicified borings. Caulostrepsis taeniola Clarke is a U-shaped boring with a vane connecting the parallel limbs. Talpina isp. is a slender, simple, branched tunnel. Most unexpected, Spirichnus spiralis Fürsich et al. is a spiral ‘worm’ boring hitherto only known from the Upper Jurassic. This stratigraphic gap is likely an artefact; only mouldic preservation of the bored substrate would expose the distinctive Spirichnus boring. These ichnofossils are united in their occurrence in unusual preservational systems. |
| |
Keywords: | Taphonomy Ichnology |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|