首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

A comparative study of seismic provisions between International Building Code 2003 and Uniform Building Code 1997
作者姓名:Wenshen  Pong  Zu-Hsu  Lee  Anson  Lee
作者单位:[1]School of Engineering, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA [2]Department of Management and Information Systems, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
基金项目:Rearch Grant from the School of Engineering, San Francisco State University
摘    要:This study focuses on the comparison of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) 1997 and International Building Code (IBC) 2003 in relation to the seismic design and analysis of special steel moment resisting frame buildings (SMRF). This paper formulates a numerical study of a steel SMRF building, studied in four different situations, namely: as an office building in San Francisco; as an office building in Sacramento; as an essential facility in San Francisco, and as an essential facility in Sacramento. The analytical results of the model buildings are then compared and analyzed taking note of any significant differences. This case study explores variations in the results obtained using the two codes, particularly the design base shear and drift ratios as they relate to different locations and occupancy use. This study also proves that IBC 2003 is more stringent for the redundancy factor under design category E for the SMRF building, and drift limits for essential facilities.

关 键 词:工程地震  国际建筑  冗余度  区域地质
文章编号:1671-3664(2006)01-0049-12
收稿时间:2006-03-21
修稿时间:2006-06-01

A comparative study of seismic provisions between International Building Code 2003 and Uniform Building Code 1997
Wenshen Pong Zu-Hsu Lee Anson Lee.A comparative study of seismic provisions between International Building Code 2003 and Uniform Building Code 1997[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2006,5(1):49-60.
Authors:Pong Wenshen  Lee Zu-Hsu  Lee Anson
Institution:1. School of Engineering, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
2. Department of Management and Information Systems, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
Abstract:This study focuses on the comparison of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) 1997 and International Building Code (IBC) 2003 in relation to the seismic design and analysis of special steel moment resisting frame buildings (SMRF). This paper formulates a numerical study of a steel SMRF building, studied in four different situations, namely: as an office building in San Francisco; as an office building in Sacramento; as an essential facility in San Francisco, and as an essential facility in Sacramento. The analytical results of the model buildings are then compared and analyzed taking note of any significant differences. This case study explores variations in the results obtained using the two codes, particularly the design base shear and drift ratios as they relate to different locations and occupancy use. This study also proves that IBC 2003 is more stringent for the redundancy factor under design category E for the SMRF building, and drift limits for essential facilities.
Keywords:Uniform Building Code 1997  International Building Code 2003  building periods  special moment resisting frame  redundancy factor
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号