首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

碳约束下中国县域尺度农业全要素生产率比较研究
引用本文:揭懋汕,郭洁,陈罗烨,雪燕,薛领. 碳约束下中国县域尺度农业全要素生产率比较研究[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(5): 898-908. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201605008
作者姓名:揭懋汕  郭洁  陈罗烨  雪燕  薛领
作者单位:1. 北京大学政府管理学院,北京 1008712. 中国农业科学院农业信息研究所,北京 100081
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2012CB955803);国家自然科学基金项目(40301012)
摘    要:基于2183个县级单元,利用SFA方法对1992-2011年碳约束下中国县域农业生态TFP及其分解项进行研究,并与不考虑碳排放的传统TFP进行比较。结果表明:第一,农业生态TFP年平均增长4.47%,低于传统TFP,但两者差距有缩小的趋势,2011年前者超过后者。第二,农业生态TFP贡献了中国农业总产值增长的54.9%,比传统TFP的份额低了3.6%,要素投入贡献为45.1%。第三,分解项上,前沿技术进步率是农业生态TFP的主要驱动因素,也是生态TFP与传统TFP差距缩小的动因。第四,空间分布上,生态TFP大于传统TFP的地区主要分布在胡焕庸线东南的地区;西部由于生态TFP和传统FTP都较低,呈现出“双重恶化”现象;除了嵊泗县以外,农业生态TE和TEC均低于传统TE和TEC,生态FTP也整体低于传统FTP。

关 键 词:中国县域  碳约束  农业TFP  时空演变  比较分析  
收稿时间:2015-12-13
修稿时间:2016-04-11

Spatial and temporal changes of total factor productivity in agriculture: A stochastic frontier analysis of China at county level, 1991-2011
Maoshan JIE,Jie GUO,Luoye CHEN,Yan XUE,Ling XUE. Spatial and temporal changes of total factor productivity in agriculture: A stochastic frontier analysis of China at county level, 1991-2011[J]. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(5): 898-908. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201605008
Authors:Maoshan JIE  Jie GUO  Luoye CHEN  Yan XUE  Ling XUE
Affiliation:1. School of Government, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China2. Agricultural Information Institute, CAAS, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:Based on 2183 county-level administrative units of China from 1991 to 2011, this paper applies SFA method to estimate TFP and its decompositions under carbon constraints and their spatial-temporal changes. The main conclusions are: First, the ecological TFP grows at an annual rate of 4.47%, lower than the traditional TFP, but the gap is narrowing and the former exceeded the latter in 2011. Second, the contribution of ecological TFP to the gross growth of China's agricultural output value is 54.9%, 3.6% lower than the share of traditional TFP, while factor inputs' contribution is 45.1%. Third, FTP is the main driving factor of ecological TFP, and has narrowed the gap between ecological and traditional TFP. Fourth, places where ecological TFP are smaller than tradition TFP are mainly distributed to the east and south of the Hu Huanyong Line. Areas west of the line have low traditional FTP and ecological TFP, showing a double deterioration phenomenon. Ecological TE and TEC are less than traditional TE and TEC except for Shengsi, and ecological FTP is small than traditional FTP on the whole.
Keywords:county level of China  carbon emissions constraint  agricultural TFP  temporal and spatial evolution  comparative analysis  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号