首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparing Two Implementations of a Micromixing Model. Part I: Wall Shear-Layer Flow
Authors:John?V.?Postma  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:jpostma@ualberta.ca"   title="  jpostma@ualberta.ca"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,John?D.?Wilson,Eugene?Yee
Affiliation:1.Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,University of Alberta,Edmonton,Canada;2.Defence R&D Canada – Suffield,Medicine Hat,Canada
Abstract:A Lagrangian stochastic (LS) micromixing model is used for estimating concentration fluctuations in plumes of a passive, non-reactive tracer dispersing from elevated and ground-level compact sources into a neutral wall shear-layer flow. SPMMM (for sequential particle micromixing model) implements the familiar IECM (interaction by exchange with the conditional mean) micromixing scheme. The parametrization of the scalar micromixing time scale is identical to that proposed in a previously reported LS–IECM model (Cassiani et al., Atmos Environ 39:1457–1469, 2005a). However, while SPMMM is mathematically equivalent to the previously reported model, it differs in its numerical implementation: SPMMM releases N independent particles sequentially, whereas the previously reported model releases N independent particles simultaneously. In both implementations, the trajectories of the N particles are governed by single-point velocity statistics. The sequential particle implementation is computationally efficient, but cannot be applied to the case of reacting species. Results from both implementations are compared to experimental wind-tunnel dispersion data and to each other.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号