On the reality of the Venus winds

An examination of the effect of assumptions in the interpretation of the Venera wind data is made as a rebuttal to the suggestion by A.T. Young that the 140 m/sec Venera 8 horizontal wind at 45 km may be either spurious or anomalous. The Venera measurements of wind speed along with the Mariner measurements of a lower region of strong turbulence are evidence for a wide band of variable high-speed retrograde horizontal winds which girdle Venus at the equator. In the prevalent interpretation of the Mariner 10 uv photographs, the region of the top of the visible cloud is characterized by variable high-speed retrograde horizontal winds which orbit Venus with an average period of 4 Earth days, and by many features indicating vertical convection. This interpretation, together with the possibility of atmospheric corotation due to frictional coupling, suggests that the Venera-Mariner band of winds at 45 km extends well beyond the top of the visible cloud, and that the upper region of strong turbulence detected by the Mariners may result in part from vertical convection currents carried along by high-speed horizontal winds. In an alternate interpretation of the Mariner 10 uv photographs Young suggests that the predominant motions may be traveling wavelike disturbances with a 4-day period rather than bulk motion of the atmosphere. For this case the upper region of strong turbulence is interpreted as due mostly to vertical wind shear resulting from a rapid decrease in wind speed within a relatively short distance above the Venera-Mariner band of high-speed winds.