Scheelite skarn granitoids: An evaluation of the roles of magmatic source and process |
| |
Authors: | R.J. Newberry S.E. Swanson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Int’l GeoSol Consulting Inc., 189 – Scripps Landing N.W. Calgary, AB T3L 1W1, Canada;2. Russian Central Geological Prospecting Institute (TsNIGRI), 129-B – Warshawskoe Chaussee, Moscow 113545, Russia;1. State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Institute of Geo-Fluids, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Collaborative Innovation Center for Exploration of Strategic Mineral Resources, School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;1. Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Ministry of Education, School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;2. School of Earth and Planetary Science, John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Bentley 6845, Australia;1. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, SinoProbe Center, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences and China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China;2. SinoProbe Center, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences and China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China;3. Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina S4S 0A2, Canada;4. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;5. State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China;6. Tianjin Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China;7. National Research Centre for Geoanalysis, Beijing 100037, China;1. Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;2. Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;4. Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Science (CODES), School of Nature Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | The compositions, mineralogies, textures, and isotopic characteristics of granitoids associated with scheelite skarns indicate these plutonic rocks cannot be uniquely described in terms of source materials, although most show distinguishing features of I-type granites*. Scheelite skarn granitoids exhibit variable evidence for crustal contamination (primarily in their Sr isotopic ratios), but there is no correlation between degree of contamination (as measured by compositiona, mineralogical, and isotopic data) and size or abundance of associated scheelite skarns. Scheelite and Cu skarn-associated granitoids are generally similar, which implies similar sources for these granitic rocks. Textural and bulk compositional data, however, suggest that scheelite skarn granitoids are different from Cu skarn granitoids by virtue of greater degree of differentiation and by crystallization in a comparatively deep plutonic environment. Consideration of relevant phase equilibria indicates that magmatic water does not exsolve until very late in the crystallization of a scheelite skarn granitoid. Through this means, tungsten is concentrated in exsolved magmatic fluids by a combination of large degree of fractional cystallization and magmatic equilibration with a very Cl-rich exsolved aqueous phase. In consequence, the search for scheelite skarns should be based not on the search for plutons with appropriate chemical compositions (major, trace, or isotopic), but rather for plutons displaying mineralogical, textural, and general geologic features which point to crystallization in a highly fractionated, relatively deep environment. Large-scale tectonic features which might give rise to crystallization in this environment include crustal overthickening, which could be caused by collisional (accretionary) events. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|