首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparison of short- and long-periodP-wave travel times and arrival angles
Authors:R J Brown  M A Enayatollah
Institution:(1) Seismological Institute, Box 517, S-751 20 Uppsala 1, Sweden
Abstract:Summary Using about 100 earthquakes recorded on both the short-period and long-period matched three-component seismograph systems at Umeå (UME) in northern Sweden, relativeP-wave travel times (LP-SP) are measured and arrival angles (incidence and azimuth) are determined from relative amplitudes ofP. Long-period onsets appear to register consistently later than short-period ones by a couple of tenths of a second. This figure is of the same order as the uncertainty in deltaT LS (difference between LP and SP onset times), but still is shown to be of some statistical significance. The effect is believed due, at least in part, to the relative inability of the long-period seismometer to visibly register an initial shorter-period lower-amplitude focal phase from some earthquakes.The dip on crustal interfaces implied by the short-period azimuth and incidence-angle anomalies is 7 to 15 times greater than that implied by the long-period anomalies. This effect is believed due to undulation or irregularity of, foremost, the Moho, as well as other crustal boundaries. The lsquowavelengthrsquo of, say, Moho undulations would seem to be limited above and below by considerations of the dominant long-period wavelengths (sim100 km) and of the lsquodiameterrsquo of Moho sampled by the short-period waves (sim50 km). The possible lsquoundesirablersquo effect of the crustal layering on the components of surface motion, and thus on the arrival angles, is discussed and cautiously dismissed, due to the absence of sedimentary layering, in favour of the above interpretation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号