首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于单历元方法研究汶川8.0级地震对中国大陆的同震变形
引用本文:李志才, 丁开华, 张鹏, 温扬茂, 赵利江, 陈建峰. GNSS观测的2021年青海玛多地震(Mw 7.4)同震形变及其滑动分布[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2021, 46(10): 1489-1497. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210301
作者姓名:李志才  丁开华  张鹏  温扬茂  赵利江  陈建峰
作者单位:1.国家基础地理信息中心测绘基准部,北京,100830;2.中国地质大学(武汉)地理与信息工程学院,湖北 武汉,430074;3.武汉大学测绘学院,湖北 武汉,430079;4.青海省基础测绘院,青海 西宁,810001;5.中移智行网络科技有限公司,上海,201206
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41774011,41874011,41804038);国家重点研发计划(2016YFB0501405)
摘    要:北京时间2020年5月22日2时,中国青海省果洛州玛多县发生Mw 7.4地震。收集震中附近9个连续运行卫星定位基准站(continuously operating reference stations,CORS)观测数据,基于模糊度解算的精密单点定位(precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution,PPP-AR)技术处理了2 h时段的高频(1 Hz采样)全球导航卫星系统(global navigation satellite system,GNSS)数据,快速确定本次地震的近场同震位移,其中水平方向最大约为0.6 m。结合远场12个CORS震前、震后各3 d低频(30 s采样)数据的非差PPP解算同震形变场,基于弹性位错模型反演了玛多地震断层几何参数和滑动分布。结果显示:玛多地震属于典型走滑事件,发震断层走向278.49°,倾角为64.38°,滑动角为-10.90°,破裂长度约为138.72 km,宽度为4.82 km;滑动量超过3 m的滑移主要集中在东部小于18 km深度的区域,最大破裂可达4.2 m。反演的地震矩为1.85×1020 Nm,相当于矩震级7.45,比美国地质调查局利用地震波的反演结果略大。

关 键 词:玛多地震  连续运行卫星定位基准站(CORS)  同震形变  断层滑动分布反演
收稿时间:2021-06-08

Determination of Earthquake Magnitude Using GPS Displacement Waveforms from Realtime Precise Point Positioning
LI Zhicai, DING Kaihua, ZHANG Peng, WEN Yangmao, ZHAO Lijiang, CHEN Jianfeng. Coseismic Deformation and Slip Distribution of 2021 Mw 7.4 Madoi Earthquake from GNSS Observation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2021, 46(10): 1489-1497. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20210301
Authors:LI Zhicai  DING Kaihua  ZHANG Peng  WEN Yangmao  ZHAO Lijiang  CHEN Jianfeng
Affiliation:1.Geodesy Datum Department, National Geomatics Center of China, Beijing 100830, China;2.School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;3.School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;4.Qinghai Institute of Basic Surveying and Mapping, Xining 810001, China;5.China Mobile Intelligent Mobility Network Co. Ltd, Shanghai 201206, China
Abstract:  Objectives  At 2:00 on May 22, 2020 (UTC+8), an Mw 7.4 earthquake struck Madoi County, Qinghai Province, China. The earthquake occurred in the unattended area of the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, with less injuries and building damage, but caused obvious surface rupture.  Methods  9 high frequency continuously operating reference stations(CORS) data with 1 Hz sampling rate were collected near the epicenter, and the co-seismic deformation was derived from high frequency observation data with 1 hour before and after the earthquake based on precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution(PPP-AR). The low frequency data with 30 s sampling of 12 CORS around Madoi County were collected before and after the earthquake within 3 days to solve for the permeant co-seismic deformation based on the non-differential precise point positioning(PPP).  Results  The comparison between these two kinds of co-seismic deformation illustrates that the co-seismic deformation from the high frequency (1 Hz) data is slightly smaller than that of the low frequency (30 s) data. The maximum observed global navigation satellite system(GNSS) co-seismic displacement is about 0.6 m.Further, the fault geometry and slip distribution of the earthquake were inverted based on the permanent co-seismic deformation.  Conclusions  The inversion results indicate that the Madoi earthquake is a typical left-lateral strike slip event (rake angle: -10.90°), with a strike of 278.49°and dip angle of 64.38°. The rupture length is about 138.72 km. The slip distribution reveals that more than 3 m slip is mainly concentrated in the eastern asperity with the depth of less than 18 km with the maximum slip of 4.2 m. The geodetic seismic moment is about 1.85×1020 Nm, equivalent to Mw 7.45, which is slightly larger than the result of United States Geological Survey(USGS) from seismic waves.
Keywords:Madoi earthquake  CORS  coseismic deformation  fault slip distribution inversion
点击此处可从《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号