首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

越南红河流域沉积物的镜下碳屑分析实验室处理方法对比研究
引用本文:陆岸青,李珍,李杰,Xuan Phong Dang,Eiji Matsumoto.越南红河流域沉积物的镜下碳屑分析实验室处理方法对比研究[J].第四纪研究,2009,29(4):825-830.
作者姓名:陆岸青  李珍  李杰  Xuan Phong Dang  Eiji Matsumoto
作者单位:1. 华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室,上海,200062
2. 越南科学技术院地理研究所,河内,越南
3. 日本名古屋大学,名古屋,4648601,日本
基金项目:国家自然科学青年基金 
摘    要:本文设计4个不同的实验方法,以越南红河流域原始森林区、河漫滩区和水下三角洲区3个不同沉积环境下的9个样品为实验对象,对镜下碳屑不同的实验室处理方法进行对比研究,实验发现样品用六偏磷酸钠分散法(方法A)和盐酸分散法(方法B)处理后,镜下碳屑形态不易分辨,杂质多,而用氢氟酸处理法(方法C)和附加醋酸酐混合液处理法(方法D),镜下碳屑的形态清晰,杂质少,碳屑数量容易统计,但是方法D中利用醋酸酐与浓硫酸混合液去纤维素与染色过程会使纤维素碳化,结果显示碳屑浓度明显比用前3种方法处理的浓度高。以上实验结果表明方法C是最优的。另外,本研究在进行碳屑统计时,利用NIS­Elements Br 3.0软件的自动统计计数功能,不仅可以减小人为计数产生的误差,还可以实现碳屑的多参数统计,有利于古环境、古气候、古植被变化的多信息解译。

关 键 词:碳屑处理方法  孢粉HF处理法  火烧

COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTS OF EXTRAVTING CHARCOALS FROM SEDIMENT WITH MICROSCOPE IN THE RED RIVER BASIN,VIETNAM
Lu Anqing,Li Zhen,Li Jie,Xuan Phong Dang,Eiji Matsumoto.COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTS OF EXTRAVTING CHARCOALS FROM SEDIMENT WITH MICROSCOPE IN THE RED RIVER BASIN,VIETNAM[J].Quaternary Sciences,2009,29(4):825-830.
Authors:Lu Anqing  Li Zhen  Li Jie  Xuan Phong Dang  Eiji Matsumoto
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research|East China Normal University|Shanghai 200062|Institute of Geography|Vietnamese  Academy of Science and Technology|Hanoi|Vietnam|Graduate School of Environmental Studies|Nagoya University|Nagoya,4648601|Japan
Abstract:This paper designs four comparative experiments of extracting charcoals from sediment.These experiments are based on nine samples from different sedimentary environments along the Red River Drainage area,Vietnam,and three samples from Virgin Forest,three from floodplain,and others from subaqueous delta.The four experiments are respectively named dispersed by(NaPO3)6 method(method A),dispersed by HCI method(method B),HF treatment method(method C)and mixture of acetic anhydride and high concentrations of H2SO4 treatment method(method D).Results show that methods C and D are easier for counting charcoals and making the charcoal shapes clearer after preparation by HF treatment than other methods because of less impurity.But method D has the process of using mixture of acetic anhydride and concentrated sulfuric acid(9:1)to remove celluloses and dye pollen,which could cause some cellulose to be carbonized,and it is proved by the experiment data.So it is less difficult to draw a conclusion that HF treatment method(method C)is the best.In addition,different treatments also influence charcoal grain size and further to calculated concentration result.Thus,it is very important to choose a suitable treatment for charcoal extraction.As for charcoal counting,we manage to use software of NIS-Elements Br 3.0 to measure the charcoal parameters statistically in serial photos instead of manual counting under microscope.This counting method not only reduces artificial inaccuracy,but also realize the multi-parameter measurement and output,which benefit to interpret more information about palaeoenviroment,paleoclimate,vegetation.
Keywords:charcoal extracting  pollen HF treatment  burning
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《第四纪研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《第四纪研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号