Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches |
| |
Authors: | Giuliano Di Baldassarre Guy Schumann Paul D. Bates Jim E. Freer Keith J. Beven |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education , , 2601 DA Delft, The Netherlands E-mail: g.dibaldassarre@unesco-ihe.org g.dibaldassarre@unesco-ihe.org;3. School of Geographical Sciences , University of Bristol , Bristol, UK;4. Lancaster Environmental Centre , Lancaster University , Lancaster, UK;5. GeoCentrum , Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden;6. ECHO, ISTAM, EPFL , Zurich, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract Different methodologies for flood-plain mapping are analysed and discussed by comparing deterministic and probabilistic approaches using hydrodynamic numerical solutions. In order to facilitate the critical discussion, state-of-art techniques in the field of flood inundation modelling are applied to a specific test site (River Dee, UK). Specifically, different flood-plain maps are derived for this test site. A first map is built by applying an advanced deterministic approach: use of a fully two-dimensional finite element model (TELEMAC-2D), calibrated against a historical flood extent, to derive a 1-in-100 year flood inundation map. A second map is derived by using a probabilistic approach: use of a simple raster-based inundation model (LISFLOOD-FP) to derive an uncertain flood extent map predicting the 1-in-100 year event conditioned on the extent of the 2006 flood. The flood-plain maps are then compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the two different approaches are critically discussed. Citation Di Baldassarre, G., Schumann, G., Bates, P. D., Freer, J. E. & Beven, K. J. (2010) Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(3), 364–376. |
| |
Keywords: | flood-plain mapping hydraulic models flood hazard uncertainty analysis |
|
|