首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

云南保山金厂河铁铜铅锌多金属矿床Rb-Sr等时线测年及其地质意义
引用本文:黄华,张长青,周云满,谢华锋,刘博,谢永富,董云涛,杨春海,董文伟.云南保山金厂河铁铜铅锌多金属矿床Rb-Sr等时线测年及其地质意义[J].矿床地质,2014,33(1):123-136.
作者姓名:黄华  张长青  周云满  谢华锋  刘博  谢永富  董云涛  杨春海  董文伟
作者单位:中国地质大学地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083;中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所, 北京 100037;云南黄金矿业集团股份有限公司, 云南 昆明 650224;中国地质大学能源学院, 北京 100083;中国地质大学地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083;云南黄金矿业集团股份有限公司, 云南 昆明 650224;云南黄金矿业集团股份有限公司, 云南 昆明 650224;云南黄金矿业集团股份有限公司, 云南 昆明 650224;云南黄金矿业集团股份有限公司, 云南 昆明 650224
基金项目:本文得到公益性科研项目(K0904,200911007);国家自然科学基金项目(40902029)和云金集团项目“滇西地区金多金属矿成矿规律及成矿系列研究”的联合资助
摘    要:金厂河铁铜铅锌多金属矿床位于保山地块北部、NS向保山-施甸复背斜与NNW向澜沧江断裂锐角交汇部位的南部。矿体呈层状、似层状产于寒武系核桃坪组金厂河背斜的层间裂隙中,受NW向、NE向断裂交汇处的控制。选取闪锌矿及其共生的方铅矿、黄铜矿、石英样品,应用Rb-Sr同位素测年方法,获得闪锌矿等时线年龄为(118.9±5.9) Ma,闪锌矿+方铅矿等时线年龄为(119.3±1.7) Ma,闪锌矿+黄铜矿等时线年龄为(120.3±5.1) Ma,闪锌矿+石英等时线年龄为(117.0±2.4) Ma,闪锌矿+方铅矿+石英等时线年龄为(118.7±1.5) Ma,闪锌矿+方铅矿+黄铜矿等时线年龄为(119.6±1.6) Ma,闪锌矿+方铅矿+黄铜矿+石英等时线年龄为(118.9±1.4) Ma。Rb-Sr定年结果表明,金厂河铁铜铅锌多金属矿床的成矿时代为117~120 Ma,为早白垩世。热液矿物组合的 (87Sr/86Sr)i平均值为0.713?885,与保山地块内志本山岩体的(87Sr/86Sr)i值接近,指示其成矿物质主要来源于地壳,成矿作用与保山地块内燕山晚期花岗岩岩浆活动有关,结合矿区重力负异常特点,推测矿区内存在隐伏的中-酸性岩体。通过地球动力学背景探讨,认为该矿床的形成可能是对中特提斯洋闭合过程中腾冲地块与保山地块碰撞造山作用的响应,与地块内部受碰撞影响而导致地壳深熔所产生的岩浆作用有关。

关 键 词:地球化学  闪锌矿  共生矿物  Rb-Sr定年  成矿时代  金厂河铁铜铅锌矿床  云南
收稿时间:2013/12/18 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/12/30 0:00:00

Rb-Sr isochron age of Jinchanghe Fe-Cu-Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit in Yunnan Province and its geological significance
HUANG Hu,ZHANG ChangQing,ZHOU YunMan,XIE HuaFeng,LIU Bo,XIE YongFu,DONG YunTao,YANG ChunHai and DONG WenWei.Rb-Sr isochron age of Jinchanghe Fe-Cu-Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit in Yunnan Province and its geological significance[J].Mineral Deposits,2014,33(1):123-136.
Authors:HUANG Hu  ZHANG ChangQing  ZHOU YunMan  XIE HuaFeng  LIU Bo  XIE YongFu  DONG YunTao  YANG ChunHai and DONG WenWei
Institution:Faculty of Sciences and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;Yunnan Gold Mining Industry Group, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China;College of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;Faculty of Sciences and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;Yunnan Gold Mining Industry Group, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China;Yunnan Gold Mining Industry Group, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China;Yunnan Gold Mining Industry Group, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China;Yunnan Gold Mining Industry Group, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
Abstract:The Jinchanghe Fe-Cu-Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit is a concealed mineral deposit located in the northern part of the Baoshan massif and lying at the intersection between the Baoshan-Shidian anticlinorium and the Lancang River fracture. The ore bodies occur in the interlayer fissures of Jinchanghe anticline in Cambrian Hetaoping Formation and are controlled by the NW-trending faults and NE-striking faults. The Rb-Sr isotopic dating was carried out for sphalerite and its associated minerals (pyrite, galena, chalcopyrite and quartz) from the Jinchanghe Fe-Cu-Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit. In addition to sphalerite age of (118.9±5.9) Ma and sphalerite+galena assemblage age of (119.3±1.7) Ma, the authors also obtained sphalerite+chalcopyrite assemblage age of (120.3±5.1) Ma, sphalerite+quartz age of (117.0±2.4) Ma, sphalerite+galena+quartz assemblage age of (118.7±1.5) Ma, sphalerite+galena+chalcopyrite assemblage age of (119.6±1.6) Ma and sphalerite+galena+chalcopyrite+quartz assemblage age of (118.9±1.4) Ma by the same means. The results of Rb-Sr isotopic dating show that the metallogenic epoch is about 117~120 Ma and the Jinchanghe Fe-Cu-Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit was formed in Early Cretaceous. The (87Sr/86Sr)i of hydrothermal mineral assemblage is equal to 0.713 885 and closed to the (87Sr/86Sr)i of Zhibenshan granite. Based on these data, the authors consider that the ore-forming materials of the ore bodies in the Jinchanghe Fe-Cu-Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit were derived from the crust and the mineralization was related to the local silicic magmatism in Late-Yanshanian period. It can be inferred that there exist concealed intermediate-acid intrusive rocks, as evidenced by the negative gravitational anomaly in the mining area. A study of the geodynamical setting indicates that the formation of the deposit was the response to the collision orogenesis of Tengchong block and Baoshan block during the closure of the Meso-Tethys period, and was related to the crustal anatexis in Baoshan block affected by the collision.
Keywords:geochemistry  sphalerite  mineral assemblage  Rb-Sr isochron age  metallogenic epoch  Jinchanghe Fe-Cu-Pb-Zn polymetallic deposit  Yunnan Province
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《矿床地质》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《矿床地质》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号