首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

库仑应力计算及应用过程中若干问题的讨论——以汶川地震为例
引用本文:石耀霖,曹建玲.库仑应力计算及应用过程中若干问题的讨论——以汶川地震为例[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(1):102-110.
作者姓名:石耀霖  曹建玲
作者单位:1.中国科学院研究生院计算地球动力学实验室,北京 100049;2.中国地震局地震预测研究所,北京 100036
基金项目:国土资源部深部探测技术与实验研究专项,中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目,国家自然科学基金项目 
摘    要:大地震发生后,估计后续地震发展趋势是人们关心的问题.目前,学术界经常利用大地震造成的库仑应力变化研讨大震对后续地震的影响,但库仑应力的计算和应用中尚有一些问题被忽视而有待探讨.本文修正了传统的库仑应力计算中沿地震破裂面滑动方向计算剪应力变化的近似方法,考虑震后主应力方向可能改变对剪应力变化量计算的影响,对改进方法和传统方法获得的结果进行了对比分析.本文基于龙门山地区背景应力场测量资料,根据不同研究者反演的地震破裂模型,计算了汶川地震造成的静态库仑应力变化,考察了不同地震破裂模型下库仑应力分布差异.在断层面附近,使用改进方法与传统方法计算的库仑应力分布差异相当大;利用多个地震破裂模型计算大地震库仑应力判断大震后余震发展趋势时,要注意破裂模型不确定性对危险性估计的影响.

关 键 词:  face=Verdana>库仑应力  修正方法  应力触发  地震危险性  
收稿时间:2009-10-18
修稿时间:2009-11-27

Some aspects in static stress change calculation——case study on Wenchuan earthquake
SHI Yao-Lin,CAO Jian-Ling.Some aspects in static stress change calculation——case study on Wenchuan earthquake[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2010,53(1):102-110.
Authors:SHI Yao-Lin  CAO Jian-Ling
Institution:1.Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;2.Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China
Abstract:When a major earthquake occurs, how aftershocks distribute catch the attention of the public. Recently, the concept of Coulomb failure stress is used frequently to study the earthquake triggering of main shock. However, there are some pendent problems in the calculation and application of Coulomb stress. In conventional calculation of Coulomb stress, the shear stress change is approximated to be the changed value along the slip on the rupture of main shock. In fact, the stress orientations may change after the event. It affects the shear stress on ruptures. We improved the formula of Coulomb stress and made comparis6n. We applied the improved method to Wenchuan earthquake. According to the stress measurement in Longmenshan and the three rupture models, we calculated the static Coulomb stress of Wenchuan earthquake. The results show big differences between conventional and improved calculation around the fault. Our investigation reminds us to concern the uncertainty of the rupture models when we use Coulomb stress to predict the aftershocks.
Keywords:Coulomb failure stress  Improved method  Earthquake trigger  Potential seismicity
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号