首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Petrological,geochemical, and mineralogical compositions of the low-Ge coals from the Shengli Coalfield,China: A comparative study with Ge-rich coals and a formation model for coal-hosted Ge ore deposit
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;2. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;3. University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511, United States;4. Jiangsu Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;5. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351, United States;1. Jiangsu Institute of Architectural Technology, Geological Survey, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China;1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China;2. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;3. Yunnan Institute of Coal Geology Prospection, Kunming 650218, China;4. The 198 Coal Geology Exploration Group, Kunming 650208, China;5. University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511, United States;6. Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetnyi per. 35, Moscow 119017, Russia;7. Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, South Africa;8. Jiangsu Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;2. University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511, United States;3. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;4. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351, United States;1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China;2. Jiangsu Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;3. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;4. University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511, United States;1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;2. Xi''an University of Science and Technology, Xi''an 710054, China;3. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;4. University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511, United States;5. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351, United States
Abstract:To better understand the formation mechanism of coal-hosted Ge ore deposits, this paper reports on the petrological, mineralogical, and geochemical compositions of the low-Ge coals in the Shengli Coalfield (Inner Mongolia, China), using optical microscopy, field emission-scanning electron microscopy, X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The samples in the present study closely neighbor the previously-reported Wulantuga coal-hosted Ge ore deposit (both No. 6 Coal). In comparison with the Wulantuga Ge-rich coals, the low-Ge coals of the Shengli field display higher moisture (27.59% on average) and lower pyritic sulfur contents (0.53%). Both the low-Ge and Ge-rich coals are generally high in inertinite, and have varying but relatively low huminite contents. Preservation of fecal pellets as macrinite is notable in both the low-Ge and Ge-rich coals, and the position of the fecal pellets appears to be within tunnels or chambers within the wood. Quartz, kaolinite, pyrite, and gypsum are the major crystalline phases identified in most of the Ge-rich and low-Ge coals, but the low-Ge coals contain significantly less pyrite and are more abundant in non-mineral Ca and Mg. Ca-oxalate of authigenic origin is observed, generally occurring as cell-fillings in the low-Ge coals. Otherwise mineral-free organic matter in the low-Ge coals would be expected to have an inherent ash yield of around 6%, derived from the inorganic elements (mainly non-mineral Ca and Mg) that occur either in the organic matter or as dissolved ions in the pore water and form the sulfate species in low-temperature (oxygen-plasma) ash residues. The highly-elevated trace elements, including Be, Ge, As, Sb, W, Hg, and Tl, that occur in the Ge-rich coals of the Wulantuga deposit, are significantly depleted in the low-Ge coals. Lateral migration of Ge–W- and As–Hg–Sb–Tl-rich solutions through the original peat swamp for the Wulantuga Ge ore deposit has led to significant enrichment of Ge on the margin of the coal basin but decreasing Ge concentrations toward to the inner part of the basin. Such a migration direction is different to those in the previously-reported for the hydrothermal solutions in the Lincang (Yunnan of China) and Spetzugli (Russian Far East) Ge ore deposits, where the solutions migrated vertically from granite to peat along faults and led to a dome-shaped Ge distribution in the relevant coal seam.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号