首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Geochronology and thermochronology of gold mineralization in the Turmalina deposit,NE of the Quadrilátero Ferrífero Region,Brazil
Institution:1. Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Lago, 562, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil;2. Departamento de Geologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, CeGUL, C6, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal;3. Departamento de Geociências, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Av. Gal. Rodrigo Otávio, 6200, Manus CEP: 69077-000, Amazonas, Brazil,;4. Instituto de Geociências Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil;5. Jaguar Mining Group, Rua Levindo Lopes 323, Funcionarios, Belo Horizonte, MG 30140-170, Brazil;1. School of the Earth Science and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;2. MLR Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;3. Centre for Exploration Targeting, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6008, Australia;4. Technology and International Cooperation Department, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100812, China;5. CNNC Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, Beijing 100029, China;1. Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Ak. Koptyga, 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia;2. Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kryukovskiy tupic, 4, 111020 Moscow, Russia;3. Prospector Ltd, Vostochnaya Str., 56 (818), 620075 Ekaterinburg, Russia;1. Far East Geological Institute, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 159 Prospect 100 let Vladivostoku, Vladivostok 690022, Russia;2. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences Beijing, 29 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100083, China;3. School of Engineering, Far Eastern Federal University, 8 Suhanova St., Vladivostok 690950, Russia;1. CONICET, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Instituto de Recursos Minerales (INREMI), Calle 64 y 120, B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina;2. CIC-BA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Instituto de Recursos Minerales (INREMI), Calle 64 y 120, B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina;1. Faculty of Earth Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;2. Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract:The Turmalina gold deposit comprises three epigenetic domains whose development is related to the propagation/reactivation events of the NW–SE Pitangui Shear Zone (PSZ). The lodes are hosted in a Late Archaean sedimentary sequence on top of a strongly deformed (mafic-dominated) metavolcanic pile metamorphosed under 3.5–4 kbar and 540–610 °C; the association forms the upper part of a lithostratigraphic succession (Pitangui Group) that overlies an older TTG gneissic basement. According to field evidence and petrographic observations, the ore-forming process is polyphasic, starting at the time when the PSZ crossed the metamorphic quartz + staurolite + biotite + almadine + hornblende isograde; the main evolving stages, however, mostly took place throughout the metamorphic retrogression path. Fluid inclusion microthermometry also shows that metamorphogenic aqueous–carbonic solutions (initially with ≈ 16–20 eq. wt.% NaCl and circulating at approximately 4 kbar and 550 °C) were subjected to repeated boiling and mixing with cooler aqueous solutions at approximately 1–2 kb and 300–350 °C. These boiling events, which were triggered by depressurization, were contemporaneous with gold (and later sulfide) deposition, preceding a late stage of hydrothermal activity under lower PT conditions (< 1 kbar and ≈ 130–230 °C). To constrain both the mineralization age and the source/pathways of the ore-forming fluids in the Turmalina deposit, a multi-system isotope (Pb–Pb, Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd) study was carried out using various whole-rock and mineral samples. The main results are as follows: (i) the onset of the ore-forming process took place at ca. 2.2–2.1 Ga; (ii) the critical timing for gold formation was confined to ca. 2–1.9 Ga; and (iii) the late hydrothermal influxes occurred after 1.75 Ga. Therefore, the ore-forming process can be envisaged as a result of successive physical–chemical processes that took place during two major, long-lasting (≈ 250 Ma) periods under initial cooling rates of approximately 1 °C/Ma and, after ca. 2–1.9 Ga, approximately 2.5 °C/Ma. Moreover, the rejuvenation episodes at ca. 2–1.9 Ga and ca. 1.75 Ga probably indicate reactivation events in the PSZ, which triggered new fluid inflows into the system and revitalized the ore-forming process. That was the case for fluids that circulated deeply through both the older basement rocks and the mafic volcanic pile, allowing either metal enrichment from multistage leaching processes of various reservoirs or possible U/Th decoupling during ore remobilization. The Turmalina ore-system lifetime is consequently confined to the Rhyacian period (Paleoproterozoic), which is compatible with the age constraints presented by other studies regarding the fold-thrust belt's development (ca. 2.125 Ga) and orogenic collapse (ca. 2.095 Ga).
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号