首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国燃煤电厂碳捕集与生物质掺烧碳捕集改造的经济性
引用本文:袁家海,王耀,张为荣,张健. 中国燃煤电厂碳捕集与生物质掺烧碳捕集改造的经济性[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(6): 764-776. DOI: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2022.043
作者姓名:袁家海  王耀  张为荣  张健
作者单位:1.华北电力大学经济与管理学院,北京 1022062 新能源电力与低碳发展研究北京市重点实验室,北京 102206
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目“碳中和下煤电退出路径、影响评估及公正转型机制设计”(72173043);洛克菲勒兄弟基金会项目“煤电退出的经济社会影响和公正转型政策研究”(21-200)
摘    要:碳捕集与封存(CCS)技术作为解决全球气候变化问题的重要手段之一,能够有效减少CO2排放。中国作为碳排放大国,当前电力的主要来源仍是煤电,碳捕集(CC)改造在燃煤电厂中有很大的应用潜力。经济性对CC改造的部署至关重要。为此,本文计算了中国各省典型电厂CC改造前后的平准化度电成本,比较了不同省份的CO2捕集成本与CO2避免成本,分析了不同掺烧率下生物质掺烧结合碳捕集(bioenergy with carbon capture,BECC)改造的经济性。研究发现,CC改造会导致不同地区的燃煤电厂度电成本增加57.51%~93.38%。煤价较低的华北和西北地区(青海除外)CC改造经济性较好,BECC改造则更适合华中地区。建议在推进燃煤电厂CC和BECC改造时要充分考虑区域资源特点,完善碳市场建设,形成合理碳价以促进CC和BECC部署。

关 键 词:碳捕集  生物质掺烧  平准化度电成本(LCOE)  CO2减排  
收稿时间:2022-03-09
修稿时间:2022-04-13

Economic analysis of carbon capture and bioenergy with carbon capture retrofitting of Chinese coal-fired power plants
YUAN Jia-Hai,WANG Yao,ZHANG Wei-Rong,ZHANG Jian. Economic analysis of carbon capture and bioenergy with carbon capture retrofitting of Chinese coal-fired power plants[J]. Progressus Inquisitiones DE, 2022, 18(6): 764-776. DOI: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2022.043
Authors:YUAN Jia-Hai  WANG Yao  ZHANG Wei-Rong  ZHANG Jian
Affiliation:1.School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China2 Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development, Beijing 102206, China
Abstract:Carbon capture and storage (CCS), as one of the important means to solve the global climate change problem, can effectively reduce CO2 emissions while retaining existing fossil energy assets. China is still reliant on coal power as the primary power supply source. Therefore, as a major carbon-emitting country, China has considerable potential for CCS applications. Economics is critical for CCS deployment. In this study, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) at province level was calculated for operational power plants after post-combustion carbon capture (CC) retrofitting. The costs of captured CO2 and avoided CO2 were then compared. The economics of coal-fired power plants with bioenergy with carbon capture retrofitting (BECC) were also analyzed. The study revealed that CC retrofitting leads to a 57.51% to 93.38% increase in the LCOE of coal power. CC retrofitting is economical in North and Northwest China (except Qinghai province) where coal prices are low. However, BECC retrofit is more suitable for coal-fired power plants in Central China where biomass prices are low. Therefore, the variation in the resource conditions among provinces should be considered when promoting CC and BECC retrofits. Compared with other power sources, coal-fired power generation becomes much more expensive after retrofits, and the current carbon market is not sufficiently developed to support the retrofits. The development of the carbon market with effective carbon price signals and proper power market mechanism is critical to the rollout of CCS in China. In addition to coal price and utilization hours, the initial investment cost and efficiency penalty of carbon capture retrofitting are also important influencing factors. With the development of new generation capture technologies with low cost and low energy consumption, the economics of coal-fired power plants with retrofitting will be further improved.
Keywords:Carbon capture (CC)  Biomass co-firing  Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE)  CO2 reduction  
点击此处可从《气候变化研究进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《气候变化研究进展》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号