Impact of solid second phases on deformation mechanisms of naturally deformed salt rocks (Kuh-e-Namak,Dashti, Iran) and rheological stratification of the Hormuz Salt Formation |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Earth Sciences, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), P.O. Box 45195-1159, Zanjan, Iran;2. State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;3. Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran;1. Department of Geology, Kharazmi University, 49 Mofatteh Avenue, Tehran 15614, Islamic Republic of Iran;2. Department of Research and Development (R & D), Pars Kani Co., Tehran 1593663415, Islamic Republic of Iran;3. Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA;4. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA;5. Institute of Geosciences and Geography, Martin-Luther-University Halle, Wittenberg, Germany;6. Department of Geology, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Islamic Republic of Iran |
| |
Abstract: | Viscosity contrasts displayed in flow structures of a mountain namakier (Kuh-e-Namak - Dashti), between ‘weak’ second phase bearing rock salt and ‘strong’ pure rock salt types are studied for deformation mechanisms using detailed quantitative microstructural study. While the solid inclusions rich (“dirty”) rock salts contain disaggregated siltstone and dolomite interlayers, “clean” salts reveal microscopic hematite and remnants of abundant fluid inclusions in non-recrystallized cores of porphyroclasts. Although the flow in both, the recrystallized “dirty” and “clean” salt types is accommodated by combined mechanisms of pressure-solution creep (PS), grain boundary sliding (GBS), transgranular microcracking and dislocation creep accommodated grain boundary migration (GBM), their viscosity contrasts observed in the field outcrops are explained by: 1) enhanced ductility of “dirty” salts due to increased diffusion rates along the solid inclusion-halite contacts than along halite–halite contacts, and 2) slow rates of intergranular diffusion due to dissolved iron and inhibited dislocation creep due to hematite inclusions for “clean” salt types Rheological contrasts inferred by microstructural analysis between both salt rock classes apply in general for the “dirty” salt forming Lower Hormuz and the “clean” salt forming the Upper Hormuz of the Hormuz Formation and imply strain rate gradients or decoupling along horizons of mobilized salt types of different composition and microstructure. |
| |
Keywords: | Halite Pressure-solution creep Second phases Namakier Fluid inclusion Viscosity |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|