首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

土壤重金属连续提取方法的优化
引用本文:刘丹丹,刘菲,缪德仁. 土壤重金属连续提取方法的优化[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(2): 390-396
作者姓名:刘丹丹  刘菲  缪德仁
作者单位:(1.中国地质科学院 水文地质环境地质研究所,河北 石家庄 050061; 2.中国地质大学(北京) 水资源与环境工程北京市重点实验室,北京 100083; 3.昆明学院 化学科学与技术系,云南 昆明 650214)
基金项目:中西部地区地下水污染调查评价综合研究(1212011121167);西北地区主要城市地下水污染调查评价(1212011220982);国家自然科学基金项目(41172226)。
摘    要:重金属在污染土壤中的形态分布决定着重金属的迁移性和危害的程度。土壤重金属形态分析应用最多的是Tessier和BCR连续提取法。Tessier和BCR连续提取法没有考虑土壤样品的特征。美国环保署危险废物浸出毒性鉴别标准法虽然考虑土壤pH值,但没有划分形态。采集不同pH土样,结合Tessier、BCR和毒性浸出鉴别方法的特征,优化出针对不同pH值土壤的连续提取方法,将土壤中重金属划分为活性态、次生碳酸盐结合态、次稳定态和稳定态。用优化的连续提取方法对土样进行连续提取,重金属回收率为85%~115%。优化连续提取方法的结果与Tessier和BCR结果对比显示优化连续提取方法克服了Tessier连续提取法对非石灰质土壤提取过量BCR连续提取法对石灰质土壤提取不足的缺点。优化后的连续提取方法数据稳定可靠,可作为重金属形态分析方法使用。

关 键 词:重金属  形态分析  连续提取方法  优化  

Optimization of Soil Heavy Metal Sequential Extraction Procedures
LIU Dan-dan,LIU Fei,MIAO De-ren. Optimization of Soil Heavy Metal Sequential Extraction Procedures[J]. Geoscience of Geosciences, 2015, 29(2): 390-396
Authors:LIU Dan-dan  LIU Fei  MIAO De-ren
Affiliation:(1.Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, CAGS, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050061, China; 2.School of Water Resources and Environment/ Beijing Key Laboratory of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083,China; 3.Department of Chemical Science and Technology, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan 650214, China)
Abstract:The environmental risks of heavy metals depend on its speciation distribution in contaminated soils. The chemical speciation analysis was one of the hot topics in environmental sciences. In recent years, the most popular sequential extraction procedures were Tessier and BCR. Nethier Tessier nor BCR sequential extraction methods considered the characteristics of soil samples. Although Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) used two different extraction regent is based on the pH values of soil samples, it is a single step extraction method. In this paper, compared with Tessier, BCR and TCLP extraction techniques, the speciation extraction method was optimized in order to adapt soils with different pH values. The heavy metals in the soils were divided into active fraction, secondary carbonate fraction, secondary steady fraction and steady fraction. The results show that the optimized sequential extraction method is more stable, the recovery rate is 85% to 115% which could satisfy the soil speciation evaluation requirements. And the optimized sequential extraction method is suitable for soils with different pH values.
Keywords:heavy metal  speciation analysis  sequential extraction procedure  optimization  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代地质》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代地质》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号