Comparison of Major and Trace Element Analyses by ICP, XRF, INAA and ID Methods |
| |
Authors: | M.D. Norman,W.P. Leeman,D.P. Blanchard§ ,J. G. Fitton&dagger ,D. James&dagger |
| |
Affiliation: | Keith-Wiess Geological Laboratories, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, Texas 77251, U.S.A.;Now at: Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia.;Planetary Materials Division, M.C.SN, Johnson Space Center, NASA, Houston, Texas U.S.A.;Grant Institute of Geology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, U.K. |
| |
Abstract: | Element concentration data for a set of silicate igneous rocks have been determined by four independent analytical methods: inductivelycoupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP), instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA), x-ray fluorescence (XRF), and isotope dilution mass spectrometry (ID). The results show excellent agreement among elements determined by more than one technique, and demonstrate the suitability of commercially available ICP instrumentation for the routine analysis of geologic material compared to other standard methods. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|