首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

栅格化属性精度损失的评估方法及其尺度效应(英文)
引用本文:白燕,廖顺宝,孙九林.栅格化属性精度损失的评估方法及其尺度效应(英文)[J].地理学报(英文版),2011,21(6):1089-1100.
作者姓名:白燕  廖顺宝  孙九林
作者单位:State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System;Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research;CAS;Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;
基金项目:The Independent Research of the State Key Laboratory of Resource and Environmental Information System,No.O88RA100SA; The Third Innovative and Cutting-edge Projects of Institute of Geographic Sciences andNatural Resources Research, CAS, No.O66U0309SZ
摘    要:Rasterization is a conversion process accompanied with information loss, which includes the loss of features’ shape, structure, position, attribute and so on. Two chief factors that affect estimating attribute accuracy loss in rasterization are grid cell size and evaluating method. That is, attribute accuracy loss in rasterization has a close relationship with grid cell size; besides, it is also influenced by evaluating methods. Therefore, it is significant to analyze these two influencing factors comprehensively. Taking land cover data of Sichuan at the scale of 1:250,000 in 2005 as a case, in view of data volume and its processing time of the study region, this study selects 16 spatial scales from 600 m to 30 km, uses rasterizing method based on the Rule of Maximum Area (RMA) in ArcGIS and two evaluating methods of attribute accuracy loss, which are Normal Analysis Method (NAM) and a new Method Based on Grid Cell (MBGC), respectively, and analyzes the scale effect of attribute (it is area here) accuracy loss at 16 different scales by these two evaluating methods comparatively. The results show that: (1) At the same scale, average area accuracy loss of the entire study region evaluated by MBGC is significantly larger than the one estimated using NAM. Moreover, this discrepancy between the two is obvious in the range of 1 km to 10 km. When the grid cell is larger than 10 km, average area accuracy losses calculated by the two evaluating methods are stable, even tended to parallel. (2) MBGC can not only estimate RMA rasterization attribute accuracy loss accurately, but can express the spatial distribution of the loss objectively. (3) The suitable scale domain for RMA rasterization of land cover data of Sichuan at the scale of 1:250,000 in 2005 is better equal to or less than 800 m, in which the data volume is favorable and the processing time is not too long, as well as the area accuracy loss is less than 2.5%.

关 键 词:rasterization  attribute  accuracy  loss  evaluation  methods  grid  cell  scale  effect  Sichuan
收稿时间:24 July 2010

Scale effect and methods for accuracy evaluation of attribute information loss in rasterization
Yan?Bai,Shunbao?Liao,Jiulin?Sun.Scale effect and methods for accuracy evaluation of attribute information loss in rasterization[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2011,21(6):1089-1100.
Authors:Yan Bai  Shunbao Liao  Jiulin Sun
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
Abstract:Rasterization is a conversion process accompanied with information loss, which includes the loss of features’ shape, structure, position, attribute and so on. Two chief factors that affect estimating attribute accuracy loss in rasterization are grid cell size and evaluating method. That is, attribute accuracy loss in rasterization has a close relationship with grid cell size; besides, it is also influenced by evaluating methods. Therefore, it is significant to analyze these two influencing factors comprehensively. Taking land cover data of Sichuan at the scale of 1:250,000 in 2005 as a case, in view of data volume and its processing time of the study region, this study selects 16 spatial scales from 600 m to 30 km, uses rasterizing method based on the Rule of Maximum Area (RMA) in ArcGIS and two evaluating methods of attribute accuracy loss, which are Normal Analysis Method (NAM) and a new Method Based on Grid Cell (MBGC), respectively, and analyzes the scale effect of attribute (it is area here) accuracy loss at 16 different scales by these two evaluating methods comparatively. The results show that: (1) At the same scale, average area accuracy loss of the entire study region evaluated by MBGC is significantly larger than the one estimated using NAM. Moreover, this discrepancy between the two is obvious in the range of 1 km to 10 km. When the grid cell is larger than 10 km, average area accuracy losses calculated by the two evaluating methods are stable, even tended to parallel. (2) MBGC can not only estimate RMA rasterization attribute accuracy loss accurately, but can express the spatial distribution of the loss objectively. (3) The suitable scale domain for RMA rasterization of land cover data of Sichuan at the scale of 1:250,000 in 2005 is better equal to or less than 800 m, in which the data volume is favorable and the processing time is not too long, as well as the area accuracy loss is less than 2.5%.
Keywords:rasterization  attribute accuracy loss  evaluation  methods  grid cell  scale effect  Sichuan
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理学报(英文版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号