首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于ERA5再分析资料的余姚地区阵风预报模型探究
引用本文:吕艺影,牛海林,郝囝,刘建勇,高益波.基于ERA5再分析资料的余姚地区阵风预报模型探究[J].气象科学,2021,41(4):551-560.
作者姓名:吕艺影  牛海林  郝囝  刘建勇  高益波
作者单位:余姚市气象局,浙江余姚315400;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/中国气象局气溶胶与云降水重点开放实验室,南京210044;余姚市气象局,浙江余姚315400;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/中国气象局气溶胶与云降水重点开放实验室,南京210044;天津市气象局,天津300000;宁波市气象局,浙江宁波315000
基金项目:宁波市科学技术局科技惠民项目(2017C50030);宁波市气象科技计划资助项目(NBQX2018014B;NBQX2020015B)
摘    要:利用2007—2017年余姚地区44个气象自动站观测数据和欧洲中心ERA5再分析资料,对余姚地区日极大风分布进行了统计分析,并提出一种本地化的经验阵风预报模型(雷暴日除外)。研究发现:余姚地区日极大风呈正态分布,风力峰值为4~5级,平均每年大风日占比达7.03%,累计大风时次占比3.32%,年平均大风日26 d。风力越小,阵风与平均风之间的线性拟合效果越好。影响阵风预报的因子主要有10 m平均风速、925 hPa风速、地面粗糙度、摩擦速度和3 h变压。6级及以下阵风预报中,业务中的阵风经验系数1.4容易造成余姚本地阵风预报偏低,适用于余姚本地阵风预报经验系数为1.775;6级以上阵风预报经验方程考虑了平均风速、垂直动量下传、水平动量传输、地面摩擦和海拔高度订正,其与925 hPa风速的平方呈正相关,与摩擦速度呈自然指数相关,经验方程相对于经验阵风系数的预报拟合优度提升了59.61%;经验阵风预报方程通过了2018—2019年的数据检验,该方程对1~2级阵风预报偏高,3~5级效果最好,6级阵风的预报偏低;6级以上的阵风等级预报准确率达55.2%。地形摩擦作用在冷空气大风与台风大风过程中尤为重要,这两类过程阵风系数分布类似,但台风带来的动量下传比冷空气更为明显。

关 键 词:ERA5再分析资料  阵风因子  阵风预报模型  台风大风  冷空气大风
收稿时间:2020/6/23 0:00:00

Analysis of wind gust forecast model in Yuyao based on the reanalysis data ERA5
Institution:Yuyao Meteorological Bureau, Zhejiang, Yuyao 315400, China;Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster(CIC-FEMD)/Key Laboratory for Aerosol-cloud-precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster(CIC-FEMD)/Key Laboratory for Aerosol-cloud-precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Tianjin Meteorological Bureau, Tianjin 300000, China;Ningbo Meteorological Bureau, Zhejiang Ningbo 315000, China
Abstract:Based on the observation data from 44 Automatic Weather Stations(AWS) in Yuyao and the reanalysis data ERA5 from ECMWF during 2007 to 2017, a statistical analysis on daily maximum wind gust of each AWS was conducted and a Localized Empirical Wind Gust Prediction Model(LEWGPM) without considering thunderstorm day was proposed. Results show that daily maximum wind gust is normally distributed with the peak of wind scale 4-5. The averaged gale day per year is 26, which account for 7.03% yearly and 3.32% hourly. It also shows the weaker the wind, the better the liner fitting between wind gust and mean winds. Some surveys on the factors that may influence the wind gust prediction were made and 10 meter mean winds, 925 hPa mean winds, roughness, friction velocity and 3 hours pressure change appear good reactions were found out. In the LEWGPM below or equal to wind scale 6, traditional empirical coefficient 1.4 has the risk of weakening the wind gust forecast and the new empirical coefficient 1.775 will lead to better forecast. When it comes to LEWGPM above wind scale 6, the mean winds, downward momentum transportation, horizontal momentum transfer, roughness and latitude are took into consideration, which found out it liner fitting to squared 925 hPa mean winds and logarithmic correlation to friction velocity. Compared to traditional empirical coefficient forecast, LEWGPM above wind scale 6 promoted 59.61%. Finally, the LEWGPM with data from 2018 to 2019 was tested, which figure out that its prediction strengthens wind scale 1-2, weakens wind scale 6, fits well with wind scale 3-5, and the accuracy of wind scale over 6 is 55.2%. The topographic friction is particularly important during typhoons and cold air events. Both the two gale processes share the similar distribution of gust factor but the different downward momentum, which means the typhoons always transfer more momentum downward.
Keywords:ERA5 reanalysis data  gust factor  LEWGPM  typhoon gale  cold air gale
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《气象科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《气象科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号