首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A comparison of photolysis rate parameters estimated from measured and simulated actinic flux for wintertime conditions at Storm Peak Laboratory,Colorado
Authors:Dongchul Kim  Christopher P Loughner  Melanie A Wetzel  Wendy S Goliff  William R Stockwell
Institution:(1) Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA;(2) Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA;(3) Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA;(4) Department of Chemistry, Howard University, 525 College Street, NW Washington, DC, 20059, USA
Abstract:Photolysis rate parameters depend upon solar actinic flux and chemical species dependent quantum yields and cross sections. Spectrally resolved measurements of actinic flux should be preferred over flux derived from models for the analysis of field observations. Actinic flux can be difficult to derive from the irradiance measurements of flat-plate radiometers. It is also difficult to estimate from models due to uncertainties in the ozone column, aerosol concentrations and distributions, cloud cover, optical depth and surface albedo. A series of actinic flux measurements were performed at Storm Peak Laboratory (3,210 m above sea level), Colorado, United States with spectroradiometers during the wintertime (January 07–10, 2004). The site is relatively remote with a clean atmosphere and during the wintertime the ground is generally covered by fresh snow with a high albedo. The actinic flux measurements were used to estimate the photolysis rate parameters of ozone, nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde. The measured actinic flux and the photolysis rate parameters derived from the flux were compared to calculations using the Tropospheric Ultraviolet-Visible Model (TUV), version 4.2 (Madronich and Flocke, 1998). The TUV modeled actinic flux, the measured flux and the photolysis rate parameters derived from them had similar temporal patterns. However there were significant differences in their magnitude due to uncertainties in the data available to initialize the TUV model and the calibration of the spectroradiometer.
Keywords:Photolysis  Actinic flux  TUV  Spectroradiometer
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号