| 三种阻尼减振结构抗震性能的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴斌,张纪刚,欧进萍. 三种阻尼减振结构抗震性能的对比分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2004, 20(1): 75-81 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴斌 张纪刚 欧进萍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 哈尔滨工业大学,土木工程学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150090;哈尔滨工业大学,土木工程学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150090;哈尔滨工业大学,土木工程学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150090 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金(59908002)，哈尔滨工业大学科学研究基金(HIT200080)，国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(59625815) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对设置两种新型摩擦阻尼器(T形芯板摩擦阻尼器和拟粘滞摩擦阻尼器)和粘滞阻尼器的单自由度结构及多层实际工程结构进行了时程分析研究。结果表明，一方面三种阻尼器都能有效地控制结构的反应，另一方面T形芯板摩擦阻尼器的位移控制效果略好于拟粘滞摩擦阻尼器，但是后者的加速度控制效果好于前者。
|
| 关 键 词： | 耗能减振 摩擦阻尼器 粘滞阻尼器 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-6069(2004)01-0075-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-03-15 |
The analysis and comparison of seismic performance of structures with three types of dampers |
| |
| WU BinZHANG Ji-gangOU Jin-ping. The analysis and comparison of seismic performance of structures with three types of dampers[J]. World Information On Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 20(1): 75-81 |
| |
| Authors: | WU BinZHANG Ji-gangOU Jin-ping |
| |
| Abstract: | Seismic performance of the SDOD and MDOF structures incorporating two types of frictional dampers and viscous damper are studied by using time history analysis method. The analysis results show that all three types of dampers can control response of structure efficiently, and T-shaped core plate frictional dampers(TFDs) possess better displacement control effects than pseudo-viscous frictional dampers(PVFDs), but, PVFDs have better acceleration control effects than TFDs. |
| |
| Keywords: | energy dissipation frictional damper viscous damper |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
