基于CiteSpace和VOSviewer的国内半城市化研究可视化分析

随着新型城镇化和国土空间规划工作的推进，半城市化地区的科学发展与治理已成为城乡融合发展的重要环节。基于文献计量分析方法，运用CiteSpace和VOSviewer可视化工具，对近30年来国内半城市化研究进行知识图谱分析。结果表明：1）作者与机构研究力量分散，地域分布特征明显；2）研究热点聚焦于分析北京、广州、上海等发达城市的土地利用、景观格局、失地农民、影响因素等问题，其内容可聚类为形态特征、空间界定、驱动机制、协调发展4类主题；3）半城市化研究发展经历了3个阶段，研究区域从东南沿海向内陆转移，内容从定性理论分析向定量实证探讨转化，视角也由自然特性分析向社会发展研究转变，体现出更多人文关怀。最后，从半城市化地区空间范围界定、人居环境建设、农业转移人口市民化路径探讨和基本公共服务均等化实施4个方面进行展望，旨在为中国半城市化地区的发展提供参考。

Visualization Analysis of Peri-Urbanization in China Based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer

With the advancement of new urbanization and territorial and spatial planning, the scientific development and governance of peri-urbanization areas have become an important link in the development of urban-rural integration. This study identifies the research hotspots and evolving process in this field and discusses the existing deficiencies and future development trends in current research, aiming to provide a reference for the development of peri-urbanization areas in China. Based on the bibliometric analysis method and using the visualization tools of CiteSpace and VOSviewer, a knowledge map analysis of domestic peri-urbanization research results over the past 30 years was conducted from the aspects of research strength, research hotspots, research topics, and evolutionary context, among others. The results show the following. 1) The research strength of the authors and institutions is scattered, the geographical distribution characteristics are obvious, and the research ability is positively correlated with the level of social and economic development. 2) Research hotspots focused on developed cities such as Beijing, Guangzhou, and Shanghai in the early stages, later expanding to central and western cities or urban agglomerations such as Wuhan, Chengdu, Chongqing, and Zhengzhou. Land use research, landscape pattern analysis, landless peasant research, and analysis of their influencing factors are the research hotspots; their respective themes can be clustered into four categories: morphological characteristics, spatial definition, driving mechanism, and coordinated development. 3) The development of peri-urbanization research can be divided into three stages: the rising stage (1992-2002), rapid growth stage (2003-2014), and stable development stage (2015-2019). The research area has shifted from the southeast coast to the inland areas, the research content has transformed from qualitative theoretical analysis to quantitative empirical discussion, and the research data have changed from traditional social and economic statistical data to spatial data and network open data. The research perspective has also changed from an analysis of natural characteristics to research on social development, reflecting more humanistic care. However, in terms of research subjects, the cooperation between authors and institutions is limited by groups and regions, and the intensity of cooperation needs to be strengthened. Regarding research content, the theoretical framework and research paradigm of peri-urbanization research are not sufficiently clear, especially in terms of conceptual connotation and space definition standards, concerning which there is still no unified approach. Regarding research perspective, the transitional path of peri-urbanization, population urbanization, ecological environment protection, construction of human settlements, and other issues should also be deeply analyzed. Finally, the prospects are constructed from four aspects: multi-scale dynamic monitoring of the spatial scope of the peri-urbanization area, creating a green and livable living environment, exploring the path of agricultural transfer population urbanization, and implementing the equalization of basic public services. The aim is to provide practical guidance for population management, resource allocation, and policy formulation in the peri-urbanization area.