Problems in the interpretation of Brazilian archaeofaunas: Different contexts and the important role of taphonomy

Studies on Brazilian archaeofauna from prehistoric and historic sites have attempted to explain human settlement and cultural trajectories in different geographical regions. However, only since 1999 have taphonomical criteria been developed during Brazilian zooarchaeological investigations. Wide ecosystem diversity results in the differential preservation of faunal remains. Until the end of the 20th century, many zooarchaeological studies presented insufficient information on complex predator–prey interaction systems in many regions, mostly from the Amazonian lowlands and the highlands of the Central Plateau. Animal remains might have been the result of natural predation, and they are often found mixed within anthropic material that could distort interpretation of deposits. Thus, there are major problems in defining diagnostic criteria to distinguish natural from cultural marks.Taphonomic analyses are needed to explain faunal remains in order to understand the particularities of human–animal relationships in Brazilian prehistory. Zooarchaeological and taphonomical data are presented from five human occupation sites dating from 9000 to 1000 BP to verify human–fauna relationships and natural deposits in three different regions of Brazil. These sites illustrate both natural and anthropic contexts.