Effects of Improper Characterization of Aquifer Thickness on Estimates of Hydraulic Conductivity from Pumping Tests |
| |
| Authors: | Paul F Hudak |
| |
| Institution: | Paul E Hudak is an assistant professor in the Department of Geography at the University of North Texas (Denton, TX 76203–5277). He received a B.S. and M.S. in geology from Allegheny College and Wright State University, respectively, and a Ph.D. in geography from the University of California, Santa Barbara. His current research interests include ground water monitoring network design and the design and analysis of aquifer tests. |
| |
| Abstract: | Pumping test data for surficial aquifers are commonly analyzed under the assumption that the base of the aquifer corresponds to the bottom of the test wells (i.e., the aquifer is truncated). This practice can lead to inaccurate hydraulic conductivity estimates, resulting from the use of low saturated thickness values with transmissivity estimates, and not accounting for the effects of partially penetrating wells. Theoretical time-drawdown data were generated at an observation well in a hypothetical unconfined aquifer for various values of saturated thickness and were analyzed by standard curve-matching techniques. The base of the aquifer was assumed to be the bottom of the pumping and observation wells. The overestimation of horizontal hydraulic conductivity was found to be directly proportional to the error in assumed saturated thickness, and to the (actual) ratio of vertical to horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kv/Kh). Inaccurately high estimates of hydraulic conductivity obtained by aquifer truncation can lead to overestimates of ground water velocity and contaminant plume spreading, narrow capture zone configuration estimates, and overestimates of available ground water resources. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
