The last interglacial ocean |
| |
Authors: | William F. Ruddiman Rose Marie L. Cline James D. Hays Warren L. Prell William F. Ruddiman Ted C. Moore Nilva G. Kipp Barbara E. Molfino George H. Denton Terence J. Hughes William L. Balsam Charlotte A. Brunner Jean-Claude Duplessy James L. Fastook John Imbrie Lloyd D. Keigwin Thomas B. Kellogg Peter R. Thompson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 USA.;2. Lamont-doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964 USA.;3. University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04473 USA.;4. University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881 USA.;5. Exxon, Stratigraphic Prediction Section, Houston, Texas 77001 USA.;6. Southampton College, Southampton, New York 11968 USA.;7. University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA.;8. Centre des Faibles Radioactivités, Laboratoire mixte CNRS-CEA, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France.;9. Godwin Laboratory, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RS, England.;10. Chevron, Le Habra, California 90631 USA.;11. Arco Oil & Gas Company, Dallas, Texas 75221 USA. |
| |
Abstract: | The final effort of the CLIMAP project was a study of the last interglaciation, a time of minimum ice volume some 122,000 yr ago coincident with the Substage 5e oxygen isotopic minimum. Based on detailed oxygen isotope analyses and biotic census counts in 52 cores across the world ocean, last interglacial sea-surface temperatures (SST) were compared with those today. There are small SST departures in the mid-latitude North Atlantic (warmer) and the Gulf of Mexico (cooler). The eastern boundary currents of the South Atlantic and Pacific oceans are marked by large SST anomalies in individual cores, but their interpretations are precluded by no-analog problems and by discordancies among estimates from different biotic groups. In general, the last interglacial ocean was not significantly different from the modern ocean. The relative sequencing of ice decay versus oceanic warming on the Stage 6/5 oxygen isotopic transition and of ice growth versus oceanic cooling on the Stage 5e/5d transition was also studied. In most of the Southern Hemisphere, the oceanic response marked by the biotic census counts preceded (led) the global ice-volume response marked by the oxygen-isotope signal by several thousand years. The reverse pattern is evident in the North Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico, where the oceanic response lagged that of global ice volume by several thousand years. As a result, the very warm temperatures associated with the last interglaciation were regionally diachronous by several thousand years. These regional lead-lag relationships agree with those observed on other transitions and in long-term phase relationships; they cannot be explained simply as artifacts of bioturbational translations of the original signals. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|