首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The value of English geoconservation sites in understanding historical collections of lower and middle palaeolithic artefacts
Institution:1. Durham University, Department of Archaeology, DH1 3LE, UK;2. Durham University, Department of Geography, DH1 3LE, UK;1. School of Geography & Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK;2. Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;3. Independent Researcher, Havant, Portsmouth, UK;1. School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, UK;2. Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK;3. Botany Department, School of Natural Science, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
Abstract:Lower and Middle Paleolithic archaeological sites in England risk falling through the cracks between different types of heritage conservation, since they lack recognisable structures; these sites have often benefitted from protection under geoconservation, particularly through selection as Geological Conservation Review sites, and subsequent designation as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). The geoconservation of key sites, particularly in the formative years of British geoconservation, has allowed combined geological and archaeological reinvestigation. This is of particular benefit to understanding Lower and Middle Paleolithic artefact assemblages, which were often collected in the later 19th–earlier 20th century and consequently lacked both detailed spatial or stratigraphic provenance and contextual geological information. As such, the ‘fine grained’ data which could be gleaned from such artefact collections was limited. Here we review the benefit of geoconservation in allowing the contextualisation of historical archaeological collections, focussing on six key English sites where geological and archaeological reinvestigation has led to important archaeological findings. In particular, the emerging evidence of chronological patterning in Lower and Middle Paleolithic artefacts makes the preservation of such deposits valuable to Quaternary science in general.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号