首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种地图产品质量评价方法的判据比较
引用本文:王庆国,王新洲. 两种地图产品质量评价方法的判据比较[J]. 测绘科学, 2006, 31(3): 137-139
作者姓名:王庆国  王新洲
作者单位:武汉大学测绘遥感信息工程国家重点实验室,武汉,430079;武汉大学测绘科学与技术学院,武汉,430079
摘    要:质量评价是测绘产品生产过程中的一个重要环节。但长期以来用于地图产品质量评价的方法,存在着诸多的局限性,难以适应地图产品在形式和质量特点上的变化。目前,以模糊数学的原理为基础的模糊综合评价方法被认为是一种较好的方法,得到越来越多的关注。但对于两者之间的优劣比较,长期以来,仅仅停留在理论上的分析。本文针对这两种方法,不仅从理论上,而且以三个判据为基础,比较了它们的特点和存在的问题。

关 键 词:模拟地图  数字地图  缺陷扣分  模糊综合评价
文章编号:1009-2307(2006)03-0137-03
收稿时间:2004-12-28
修稿时间:2004-12-28

Criterion comparison between two assessment methods for the quality of maps
WANG qing-guo,WANG xin-zhou. Criterion comparison between two assessment methods for the quality of maps[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2006, 31(3): 137-139
Authors:WANG qing-guo  WANG xin-zhou
Abstract:Quality assessment is an important step in surveying products manufacturing.But the methods that have being used for assessing the quality of maps till now have many defects,which make them difficult to meet maps'changes in form and quality characteristic.At present,fuzzy comprehensive assessment method is considered as a better method,and attracts more and more attention.But the research on the difference between those two methods is always just theoretical.This paper makes a comparison between their characteristics not just based on theory,but on three evidences.
Keywords:analogous map  digital map  scorn-diminution for defect  fuzzy comprehensive assessment
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号