首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两个大气环流模式SAMIL和BCC_AGCM对北半球冬季极涡振荡的模拟对比
引用本文:刘玉镇,任荣彩,何编. 两个大气环流模式SAMIL和BCC_AGCM对北半球冬季极涡振荡的模拟对比[J]. 大气科学, 2012, 36(6): 1191-1206. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2012.11244
作者姓名:刘玉镇  任荣彩  何编
作者单位:1.中国海洋大学海洋环境学院, 青岛 266100;中国科学院大气物理研究所大气科学和地球流体力学数值模拟国家重点实验室, 北京 100029;
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划 2010CB428600、2010CB950400
摘    要:基于与NCEP再分析资料的比较, 本文利用大气环流模式SAMIL和北京气候中心大气环流模式BCC_AGCM的1950~1999年的AMIP试验模拟数据, 对北半球冬季环流及平流层极涡振荡的模拟性能进行了评估分析。结果表明两个模式都可以再现北半球环流基本型以及环流振荡的主导模态。对冬季气候平均态的模拟, 两个模式模拟的热带—热带外温度梯度均偏大, 极夜急流偏强, 极涡偏冷偏强;100~20 hPa平均位势高度场谐波分析表明两个模式模 拟的行星波偏弱;气候平均的10 hPa极夜急流均存在1个月的季节漂移, 200 hPa副热带西风急流较NCEP偏弱。两个模式模拟的环流变化的主导模态均代表极涡振荡, SAMIL极涡振荡的强度大于BCC_AGCM, BCC_AGCM极涡振荡的频率要高于SAMIL。连续功率谱分析表明, NCEP资料中极涡振荡存在4.6个月的显著周期, 相应地, SAMIL中为5.5个月的显著周期, BCC_AGCM中为4.8个月。NCEP资料中的极涡振荡主要发生在12~3月, SAMIL模拟的极涡振荡主要发生在2~3月, BCC_AGCM模拟的极涡振荡主要发生在2~4月。

关 键 词:SAMIL   BCC_AGCM   平流层极涡振荡
收稿时间:2011-12-19
修稿时间:2012-05-08

Comparison of SAMIL and BCC_AGCM Simulations of the Polar Vortex Oscillation in the Northern Hemisphere Winter
Liu Yuzhen,Ren Rongcai and He Bian. Comparison of SAMIL and BCC_AGCM Simulations of the Polar Vortex Oscillation in the Northern Hemisphere Winter[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2012, 36(6): 1191-1206. DOI: 10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2012.11244
Authors:Liu Yuzhen  Ren Rongcai  He Bian
Affiliation:College of Physical and Environmental Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100;State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;;State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;;State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029;Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044
Abstract:By using AMIP simulation results for 1950-1999 from SAMIL and BCC_AGCM, the performance of the models in simulating the winter stratospheric circulation and polar vortex oscillation is assessed by comparing their results with the NCEP data. Both models can reproduce the general patterns of the winter climatology and the leading oscillation mode of the winter stratospheric circulation. However, the meridional temperature gradients between the tropics and the extratropics simulated by two models, as well as the polar vortex and polar jet, are much stronger on average than those in the NCEP data. Harmonic analysis of the winter climatology geopotential height from 100 hPa to 20 hPa indicates that planetary waves in both models are significantly weaker than in the NCEP data. A one-month seasonal drift exists in the seasonal evolution of the 10 hPa polar jet in both models compared with the NCEP data, and the simulated subtropical westerly jet at 200 hPa is weaker. The first empirical orthogonal function modes of the zonal-mean zonal wind anomalies from both models reflect oscillations in the intensity of the stratospheric polar vortex, whereas the occurrence of polar vortex oscillation events is more frequent in BCC_AGCM than in SAMIL. The dominant period of the polar vortex oscillation events is 5.5 months in SAMIL, 4.8 months in BCC_AGCM, and 4.6 months in the NCEP data. Furthermore, polar vortex oscillation events occur mainly in February-March in SAMIL and in February-April in BCC_AGCM, whereas they occur from December to March in the NCEP data.
Keywords:SAMIL  BCC_AGCM  stratospheric polar vortex oscillation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《大气科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《大气科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号