首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Governing agriculture-forest landscapes to achieve climate change mitigation
Institution:1. School of Natural Resources and Environment, International Forestry Resources and Institutions, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States;2. Gund Institute, University of Vermont and CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, 617 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05482, United States;3. Department of Geography/Curriculum for the Environment and Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States;1. School of Natural Resources and Environment, International Forestry Resources and Institutions, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States;2. Gund Institute, University of Vermont and CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, 617 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05482, United States;3. Department of Geography/Curriculum for the Environment and Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Abstract:This introduction to the special section on “Governing Agriculture-Forest Landscapes to Achieve Climate Change Mitigation” reviews external interventions to improve forest conditions and reduce deforestation, and by extension, influence carbon storage in agriculture-forest landscapes. The review is based on a careful survey of 123 cases of project-based and policy interventions to influence land use and forest cover outcomes. We propose that outcomes of interventions can be explained in terms of rights, incentives, and technologies related to land use and apply this framework to examine 12 types of interventions in agriculture-forest landscapes. The analysis of the identified 123 cases raises concerns about consistency of data and comparability of cases. Our preliminary evidence suggests limited association between the stated objective of an intervention and its success. This evidence also suggests that smaller scale and effective enforcement may be positively associated with improved forest outcomes. But the effectiveness of interventions across different agriculture-forest landscapes varies and available evidence does not permit easy generalizations. The variable effects of interventions across different agriculture-forest landscapes point to the need to better understand the forms and functions of interventions and to problems associated with assessing their relative efficacy.
Keywords:Governance  Forestry  Agriculture  Tenure  Enforcement  Payments for ecosystem services
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号