| 评地震危险性分析方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭增建 秦保燕. 评地震危险性分析方法[J]. 内陆地震, 1989, 3(1): 17-21 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭增建 秦保燕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国家地震局兰州地震研究所(郭增建)，国家地震局兰州地震研究所(秦保燕) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文对目前我国地震危险性分析中普遍采用的概率方法,即洪华生模型进行了分析和评述。指出上述方法忽略了断层间的相互影响;将未来大震看作小概率事件是对古登堡震级与频次关系的误解;同时,该方法中极值理论的时间概念是不可靠的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 地震 危险性 概率 断层 分析法 |
APPRAISING THE METHODS OF SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS |
| |
| Guo Zengjian Qin Baoyan. APPRAISING THE METHODS OF SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS[J]. Inland Earthquake, 1989, 3(1): 17-21 |
| |
| Authors: | Guo Zengjian Qin Baoyan |
| |
| Abstract: | The calculating metnod-A.D. Kinreghian model, which which was commonly used in the seismic damage analysis in the country, has been analysed and appraised. It is pointed out that the method mentioned above neglected the interference between the faults. It also considered there is a misunderstanding for the relation between Gutenberg magnitude and grequency, as the method took the future large earthquakes as a small probability event. Meanwhile, the idea of time in extreme theroy of the method is not reliable. |
| |
| Keywords: | Seismic damage Probability Fault Gutenberg formula Kinreghian model |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
