Quantity Does Not Always Mean Quality: The Importance of Qualitative Social Science in Conservation Research |
| |
| Authors: | Niki A Rust Amber Abrams Daniel W S Challender Guillaume Chapron Arash Ghoddousi Jenny A Glikman |
| |
| Institution: | 1. WWF-UK, Living Planet Centre, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdomniki_rust@hotmail.co.uk;3. School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom;4. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom;5. Grims? Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan, Sweden;6. Conservation Biogeography Lab, Geography Department, Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany;7. Community Engagement, San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, California, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Qualitative methods are important to gain a deep understanding of complex problems and poorly researched areas. They can be particularly useful to help explain underlying conservation problems. However, the significance in choosing and justifying appropriate methodological frameworks in conservation studies should be given more attention to ensure data are collected and analysed appropriately. We explain when, why, and how qualitative methods should be used and explain sampling strategies in qualitative studies. To improve familiarity with qualitative methods among natural scientists, we recommend expanding training in social sciences and increasing collaboration with social scientists. Given the scale of human impacts on the environment, this type of nuanced analytical skill is critical for progressing biodiversity conservation efforts. |
| |
| Keywords: | Human–wildlife conflict qualitative methods quantitative methods social sciences study design |
|
|
