Comment on “Indicator principal component kriging” by V. Suro-Pérez and A. G. Journel |
| |
Authors: | Ch. Lajaunie |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Centre de Géostatistique École des Mines de Paris, 35 Rue St. Honore, 77305 Fontainebleau, France |
| |
Abstract: | Conclusions The indicators covariance is equivalent to the bivariate distribution of the class index. The factor decomposition of the indicator covariance proposed by SPJ is an isofactorial model of the corresponding bivariate distribution. However, the choices of cumulative indicators and of principal component analysis produce unacceptable inconsistencies. In LL, a correspondence analysis of the bivariate distribution was used to produce more satisfactory empirical factors. These were used in the procedure of identification of discrete isofactorial models, with improved consistency, and the benefit of change of support models. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|