首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种模式在风电场风速预测应用中的对比
引用本文:严晓瑜,李剑萍,杨侃,缑晓辉,肖国平,高扬,郭晓雷. 两种模式在风电场风速预测应用中的对比[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(6): 1015-1024
作者姓名:严晓瑜  李剑萍  杨侃  缑晓辉  肖国平  高扬  郭晓雷
作者单位:1. 宁夏银川市气象局,宁夏银川,750002
2. 宁夏气象科学研究所,宁夏银川,750002
3. 宁夏气象台,宁夏银川,750002
4. 宁夏气象服务中心,宁夏银川,750002
5. 宁夏贺兰山风电场,宁夏银川,750000
基金项目:宁夏气象防灾减灾重点实验室项目“风功率预报系统中风速预报改进技术研究”、中国气象局2013气象关键技术集成与应用项目,宁夏气象局项目“基于WRF和BJ-RUC数值模式的高分辨率风速释用订正模型及其预测服务系统研发”共同资助
摘    要:利用2011年12月至2012年11月贺兰山风电场测风塔实测资料和同期WRF、BJ-RUC模式预测结果,对2种模式在风速预测中的应用进行对比分析。结果发现,月尺度上,2种模式预测的风速月均值普遍较实测值高,且WRF较BJ-RUC更接近实测值;WRF预测的月平均风速标准差普遍较实测低,而BJ-RUC普遍比实测大;春季WRF预测效果整体上较BJ-RUC好,其它季节WRF预测的月平均风速均方根误差较BJ-RUC的小,但与实测风速的相关性较BJ-RUC与实测风速相关性差。日尺度上,凌晨至中午前后和傍晚至前半夜2个时段,2种模式预测风速普遍比实测值大,而中午至傍晚时分正相反,预测值普遍较实测小。2种模式对〉12 m·s^-1风速预测的均方根误差最小,其次是3~12 m·s^-1,〈3 m·s^-1风速预测的均方根误差最大,但BJ-RUC对3~12 m·s^-1范围风速的变化趋势把握能力较好。WRF和BJ-RUC都普遍低估了1~4 m·s^-1风速段的频次,对5~10 m·s^-1范围频次普遍明显高估,对10 m·s^-1以上风速,WRF预测频次较实测低,而BJ-RUC预测频次则较实测高。BJ-RUC对该区风向的预测能力较WRF好。

关 键 词:风速、风向预测  WRF模式  BJ-RUC模式  风电场

Application and Comparison of WRF and BJ-RUC Models on Wind Speed Forecast in Wind Power Field
YAN Xiaoyu,LI Jianping,YANG Kan,GOU Xiaohui,XIAO Guoping,GAO Yang,GUO Xiaolei. Application and Comparison of WRF and BJ-RUC Models on Wind Speed Forecast in Wind Power Field[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2014, 32(6): 1015-1024
Authors:YAN Xiaoyu  LI Jianping  YANG Kan  GOU Xiaohui  XIAO Guoping  GAO Yang  GUO Xiaolei
Affiliation:YAN Xiaoyu, LI Jianping, YANG Kan, GOU Xiaohui, XIAO Guoping, GAO Yang, GUO Xiaolei( 1. Yinchuan Meteorological Bureau of Ningxia, Yinchuan 750002, China ; 2. Ningxia Meteorological Science Institute, Yinchuan 750002, China; 3. Ningxia Meteorological Observatory, Yinchnan 750002, China; 4. Ningxia Meteorological Service Center, Yinchuan 750002, China; 5. Helanshan Wind Power Farm of Ningxia, Yinchuan 750000, China)
Abstract:Based on the observational wind data of Helanshan mountain wind power field from December 2011 to November 2012 and forecasted wind data of the same period by WRF and BJ- RUC models,the applications of two models in wind speed and wind direction forecasting were comparatively analyzed. The results showed that the monthly average wind speeds forecasted by WRF and BJ-RUC models were generally higher than the observation value,and the forecasted wind speed of WRF was more close to the observation than that of BJ- RUC. The standard deviations of wind speed forecasted by WRF were generally lower than the observation values,while that of BJ- RUC were generally larger than the observation. The prediction effects of WRF were better than BJ- RUC in spring,and the root mean squared errors( RMSE) of the monthly average wind speed forecasted by WRF were smaller than that of BJ- RUC in summer,autumn and winter,while the correlation of wind speed between observation and forecasted values by WRF model was worse than that with BJ- RUC. On daily scale,from the early morning to noon and evening to midnight,the forecasted wind speed of WRF and BJ- RUC models were generally higher than the measured value,while these were generally smaller than the observations from noon to evening. RMSE of wind speed greater than 12 m·s^-1orecasted by two models was the minimum,followed by 3- 12 m·s^-1while that was the maximum for wind speed less than 3 m·s^-1 The forecasted wind speed of two models had good correlation with the measured wind speed with 3- 12 m·s^-1and BJ- RUC model had certain advantages on trend prediction of wind speed. The frequencies of wind speed with 0- 1 m·s^-1nd 4- 10 m·s^-1ere generally underrated by WRF and BJ- RUC models,and were obviously overestimated to 5- 10 m·s^-1ind speed,and for wind speed of 10 m·s^-1nd above,the frequency of forecasted wind speed of WRF model was lower than the observation,while that of BJ- RUC was higher than the actual. The ability of forecasted wind direction by BJ- RUC was bette
Keywords:wind speed and direction forecast  WRF model  BJ-RUC model  wind power field
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号