首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Reply to Hüneke’s (2005) comment
Authors:H. Huckriede  K. Wemmer
Affiliation:1. Thüringer Landesanstalt für Umwelt und Geologie (Au?enstelle Weimar), Prüssingstra?e 25, 07745, Jena, Germany
2. Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universit?t G?ttingen, Abteilung Isotopengeologie, Goldschmitdtstra?e 1-3, 37077, G?ttingen, Germany
Abstract:Hüneke (Int J Earth Sci 2005) gives a new interpretation of the tectonic setting of five 40K/40Ar analyses published by Huckriede et al. (Int J Earth Sci 93: 414–431, 2004). In this context, Hüneke discusses the significance and provenance of Late Proterozoic 40K/40Ar-cooling ages of detrital muscovites from pre-flysch sediments of the Blankenburg and Harzgerode Zones (Harz Mountains). Hüneke’s reinterpretation is based on a wrong concept concerning the extend of the Blankenburg Zone. This wrong concept originates from the incorrect distinction between the greywackes of the Tanne Zone and the greywackes of the Gießen-Harz Nappe. These greywackes can be easily distinguished by petrographic methods. Hüneke additionally defends the assumption that large areas of the eastern Harz Mountains consist of Viséan olistostromes. There is no need for an extended discussion of this topic because Hüneke presents no arguments.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号