社会文化地理知识生产的表征与非表征维度

采用文献归纳和理论思辨法,对社会文化地理知识生产的表征和非表征表达、关系转换及权力政治等内容进行了系统分析。研究认为,表征的本质是作为替代品指代实物符号化的实践,非表征是动态性隐蔽对象显性化的实践。表征与非表征是社会文化地理知识生产的重要维度,两者具有同构性和互补性;出于差异化的逻辑抽象方式,两者又存在较大的表达区分。表征主要是对特殊意义"知识节点"的关注,具有共享性、社会性、说明性和稳定性;非表征主要是对非稳定性流动知识、活力性知识和关联性知识的关注,具有经验性和情境性、具身性和体验性、结构性和交互性;表征与非表征不仅具有内在关联性,也存在转换的必要性,这是人们积极应对社会文化地理知识认识论危机的一种可能方案,也是人们更加精确认识地理知识生产的前提和基础;随着后现代地理学语境的兴起,以及人们对话语、身份等要素的关注,社会文化地理知识生产的表征与非表征方式受到了权力政治因素的影响,这使表征和非表征实践具有了表达协商的意蕴,这一研究发现将创新并拓展对表征和非表征的传统理解。未来研究应多聚焦在表征和非表征的内涵解读、内容和方法呈现层面,这既有利于丰富社会文化地理知识生产的表达方式,也有利于...

On the Representation and Non-representation Dimensions of the Production of Social and Cultural Geographical Knowledge

By using the methods of literature induction and theoretical speculation, this paper systematically analyzes the representation and non-representation expression, relationship transformation and power politics of the production of social and cultural geographical knowledge. It is believed that the essence of representation is the practice of symbolization of objects as substitutes, while non-representation is the practice of manifesting the invisible characteristics of dynamic objects. Representation and non-representation are the multiple expression channels of people's information transmission, as well as the overall thinking framework of meaning writing in geography. They have mutual construction and complementarity in the expression of information and meaning. Due to the different logical abstraction, there is a big difference between representation and non-representation. Representation is mainly concerned about the emergence of “knowledge nodes” of special significance, which has the characteristics of sharing, sociality, explanation and stability; Non-representation is mainly concerned about such aspects as “flow and connection between knowledge nodes”, “inter relationship and relationship subject” and “physical life vitality experience”, which is experiential and situational, physical and experiential, structural and interactive. Representation and non-representation are not only intrinsically related, but also have the necessity of transformation, which is a possible solution for people to deal with the epistemological crisis of social and cultural geographical knowledge, and also the premise and foundation for people to understand the production of geographical knowledge more accurately. With the rise of postmodern geographical context and people's attention to discourse, identity and other elements, the representation and non-representation of social and cultural geographical knowledge production are influenced by power politics, which makes the representation and non-representation practice have the meaning of expression negotiation. This discovery will innovate and expand the traditional understanding of representation and non-representation. In the future research, we should focus more on the connotation interpretation, content and method presentation of representation and non-representation, which is not only conducive to the multiple expression of geographical writing, but also conducive to people's scientific guidance of geographical practice.