| Abstract: | All palaeomagnetic investigations from the Phanerozoic of Australia are summarized and critically reviewed. Some smaller studies have been combined to produce more viable palaeomagnetic poles all of which are only considered if standard cleaning procedures were used. Analysis of the resulting data shows that during the Early Palaeozoic the pole paths for northern and central Australia are similar confirming the regions were a single unit during that time. However, these paths and the one derived from a limited region of southeast Australia approach each other from opposite directions and appear to converge during the Devonian. This observation is consistent with interpretations of the geology of the Tasman Orogenic Zone in terms of plate-tectonic models and with palaeomagnetic data from the Gondwanic continents. The presence of possible ancient plate margins bounding the region, from which most palaeomagnetic results from southeast Australia are derived, confirms that this region only became welded to the main Australian plate in Devonian times. Data for the Mesozoic of southeast Australia continue to be incompatible both with the generally accepted Australia—Antarctica relationship and with all other Gondwanic results. There appears to be no geological evidence in support of the large-scale relative motion inferred by the data and they remain a puzzling inconsistency. Cenozoic results, however, are entirely compatible with the northward motion of Australia away from Antarctica as inferred from sea-floor spreading. Comparisons with results from India suggest that the drift history of India prior to 75 m.y. ago involved movement from a location adjacent to Antarctica. It is proposed that the Wharton Basin was occupied by a northerly extension of Peninsular India which lay adjacent to western Australia. This larger Indian subcontinent broke away from both Antarctica and Australia about 140 m.y. ago. |
