首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Risk analysis for water resources management under dual uncertainties through factorial analysis and fuzzy random value-at-risk
Authors:X?M?Kong  Email author" target="_blank">G?H?HuangEmail author  Y?R?Fan  Y?P?Li  X?T?Zeng  Y?Zhu
Institution:1.Fundamental College,Beijing Polytechnic,Beijing,China;2.Center for Energy, Environment and Ecology Research, UR-BNU,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,China;3.Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainable Communities,University of Regina,Regina,Canada;4.School of Labor Economics,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing,China;5.School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an,China
Abstract:Water resources systems are associated with a variety of complexities and uncertainties due to socio-economic and hydro-environmental impacts. Such complexities and uncertainties lead to challenges in evaluating the water resources management alternatives and the associated risks. In this study, the factorial analysis and fuzzy random value-at-risk are incorporated into a two-stage stochastic programming framework, leading to a factorial-based two-stage programming with fuzzy random value-at-risk (FTSPF). The proposed FTSPF approach aims to reveal the impacts of uncertainty parameters on water resources management strategies and the corresponding risks. In detail, fuzzy random value-at-risk is to reflect the potential risk about financial cost under dual uncertainties, while a multi-level factorial design approach is used to reveal the interaction between feasibility degrees and risk levels, as well as the relationships (including curvilinear relationship) between these factors and the responses. The application of water resources system planning makes it possible to balance the satisfaction of system benefit, the risk levels of penalty and the feasibility degrees of constraints. The results indicate that decision makers would pay more attention to the tradeoffs between the system benefit and feasibility degree, and the water allocation for agricultural section contributes most to control the financial loss of water. Moreover, FTSPF can generate a higher system benefit and more alternatives under various risk levels. Therefore, FTSPF could provide more useful information for enabling water managers to identify desired policies with maximized system benefit under different system-feasibility degrees and risk levels.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号