Primary production and nutrient content in two salt marsh species,<Emphasis Type="Italic">Atriplex portulacoides</Emphasis> L. and<Emphasis Type="Italic">Limoniastrum monopetalum</Emphasis> L., in Southern Portugal

Seasonal variation patterns of aboveground and belowground biomass, net primary production, and nutrient accumulation were assessed inAtriplex portulacoides L. andLimoniastrum monopetalum (L.) Boiss. in Castro Marim salt marsh, Portugal. Sampling was conducted for five periods during 2001–2002 (autumn, winter, spring, summer, and autumn). This study indicates that both species have a clear seasonal variation pattern for both aboveground and belowground biomass. Mean live biomass was 2516 g m⁻² yr⁻¹ forL. monopetalum and 598 g m⁻² yr⁻¹ forA. portulacoides. Peak living biomass, in spring for both species, was three times greater in the former, 3502 g m⁻² yr⁻¹, than in the latter, 1077 g m⁻² yr⁻¹. For both the Smalley (Groenendijk 1984) and Weigert and Evans (1964) methods, productivity ofL. monopetalum (2917 and 3635 g m⁻² yr⁻¹, respectively) was greater than that ofA. portulacoides (1002 and 1615 g m⁻² yr⁻¹, respectively). Belowground biomass ofL. monopetalum was 1.7 times greater than that ofA. portulacoides. In spite of this, the root:shoot ratio forA. monopetalum to aerial components. Leaf area index was similar for both species, but specific leaf area ofA. portulacoides was twice that ofL. monopetalum. The greatest nutrient contents were found in leaves. Leaf nitrogen content was maximum in summer for both species (14.6 mg g⁻¹ forA. portulacoides and 15.5 mg g⁻¹ forL. monopetalum). Leaf phosphorus concentration was minimum in summer (1.1 mg g⁻¹ inA. portulacoides and 1.2 mg g⁻¹ inL. monopetalum). Leaf potassium contents inA. portulacoides were around three times greater than inL. monopetalum. Leaf calcium contents inL. monopetalum were three times greater than inA. portulacoides. There was a pronounced seasonal variation of calcium content in the former, while in the latter no clear variation was registered. Both species exhibited a decrease in magnesium leaf contents in the summer period. Mangamese content inL. monopetalum leaves was tenfold that inA. portulacoides. Seasonal patterns of nutrient contents inA. portulacoides andL. monopetalum suggest that availability of these elements was not a limiting factor to biomass production.