首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于岩石圈厚度和地幔横向黏度变化的地幔对流模型重估云南地区剪切波各向异性源的深度
引用本文:朱涛,马小溪. 基于岩石圈厚度和地幔横向黏度变化的地幔对流模型重估云南地区剪切波各向异性源的深度[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(2): 284-295. DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.6.28
作者姓名:朱涛  马小溪
作者单位:中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京100081;中国地震局地质研究所地震动力学国家重点实验室,北京100029;中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京100081;吉林省地震局,吉林长春130117
基金项目:地震动力学国家重点实验室开放基金项目(LED2017B08);国家自然科学基金面上项目(41974103)
摘    要:在已有模型的基础上,考虑岩石圈厚度和软流层横向黏度的变化,本文建立了更接近地球实际情形的地幔对流模型,然后重新推测了导致云南地区剪切波各向异性的软流层源的深度.结果 表明:岩石圈厚度和软流层横向黏度变化对云南地区的软流层各向异性源的深度及软流层的变形程度和机制具有重要影响;软流层各向异性对云南西南部区域、东部区域北纬2...

关 键 词:软流层各向异性  地震各向异性  地幔对流  软流层变形  地幔动力学
收稿时间:2019-06-12

Re-estimating the depth of shear wave splitting anisotropy in the Yunnan region by using a mantle convection model based on lithospheric thickness and lateral mantle viscosity variations
ZHU Tao,MA Xiaoxi. Re-estimating the depth of shear wave splitting anisotropy in the Yunnan region by using a mantle convection model based on lithospheric thickness and lateral mantle viscosity variations[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(2): 284-295. DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.6.28
Authors:ZHU Tao  MA Xiaoxi
Affiliation:1. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China2. State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China3. Jilin Earthquake Agency, Changchun 130117, China
Abstract:In the present paper, we propose a more realistic mantle convection model by introducing the lithospheric thickness and lateral asthenospheric viscosity variations into a previous model and re-estimate the depth of shear wave splitting (SWS) anisotropy. Our results indicate that the variations greatly affected the depth of asthenospheric source responsible for SWS anisotropy and the intensity and mechanism of asthenospheric deformation in the Yunnan region. Asthenospheric anisotropy obviously contributed to a SWS residing at 90-180, 170-330, and 200-320 km depths in southwestern Yunnan, eastern Yunnan south of 26°N, and the Sichuan Basin and its western margin, respectively. Asthenosphere responsible for a SWS in southwestern Yunnan and eastern Yunnan south of 26°N likely experienced large shear deformation and was primarily controlled by mantle flow-direction/flow-plane mode; whereas asthenosphere resposible for a SWS in the Sichuan Basin and its western margin likely experienced small shear deformation and was mainly controlled by strain mode.
Keywords:asthenospheric anisotropy  seismic anisotropy  mantle convection  asthenospheric deformation  mantle dynamics  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地学前缘》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地学前缘》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号