首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

陆生节肢动物采集方法比较(英文)
引用本文:邹怡,冯金朝,薛达元,桑卫国,Jan C.AXMACHER.陆生节肢动物采集方法比较(英文)[J].资源与生态学报(英文版),2012,3(2):174-182.
作者姓名:邹怡  冯金朝  薛达元  桑卫国  Jan C.AXMACHER
作者单位:1. 伦敦大学学院地理学系,伦敦WC1E6BT,英国
2. 中央民族大学生命与环境科学学院,北京,100082
3. 植被与环境变化国家重点实验室,中国科学院植物研究所,北京100093
基金项目:the China Bureau of Foreign Experts,the Ministry of Education of China (111 Program,Grant 2008B08044);the Chinese Academy of Sciences’Fellowship for Young International Scientists (Fellowship Number 2010Y1SA16);the Key Basic Research Project“973”(2010CB951301-5)
摘    要:陆生节肢动物是生态系统的十分重要组成部分。面对广泛分布的陆生节肢动物,如何选择最合适采集方法是长期以来被探讨的话题。本文介绍了一些常用的陆生节肢动物采集方法。我们将其分为三大类:有"活动密度"缺点的被动采集方法,无"活动密度"缺点的被动采集方法以及带有内在"活动密度"缺点的主动采集方法,并探讨了各种方法的优缺点,为生物多样性研究以及病虫害防治工作提供了基础。如何选择合适的采集方法主要取决与采集的目的以及目标物种的生活习性,在大多数情况下,多种不同的采集方法组合将会有较好的效果。

关 键 词:陆生节肢动物  采集方法  比较  活动密度
收稿时间:2012-02-24

A Comparison of Terrestrial Arthropod Sampling Methods
ZOU Yi , FENG Jinchao , XUE Dayuan , SANG Weiguo , Jan C.AXMACHER.A Comparison of Terrestrial Arthropod Sampling Methods[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology,2012,3(2):174-182.
Authors:ZOU Yi  FENG Jinchao  XUE Dayuan  SANG Weiguo  Jan CAXMACHER
Institution:1.Department of Geography, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;2.College of Life and Environmental Science, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100082, China;3.The State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, CAS, Beijing 100093, China
Abstract:Terrestrial arthropods are extremely important ecosystem components. The choice of best approaches to collect the wide range of terrestrial arthropods has been a topic of long-lasting debates. This article provides a brief overview of common sampling methods for terrestrial arthropod assemblages. We divide sampling methods into three main categories: passive sampling methods without any "activity density" bias, passive sampling methods with an "activity density" bias, and active sampling methods with inherent "activity density" and often further species-dependent biases, discussing their individual advantages and shortcomings as basis for biodiversity studies and pest control management. The selection of the optimal sampling methods depends strongly on the purpose of individual studies and the ecology and behavior of the arthropod groups targeted. A combination of different suitable methods is highly recommended in many cases.
Keywords:terrestrial arthropods  sampling methods  comparison  activity density
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《资源与生态学报(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《资源与生态学报(英文版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号