首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Mobile policies and policy streams: The case of smart metering policy in Australia
Affiliation:1. University of Málaga Department of Electrical Engineering, Spain;2. Endesa, Spain;3. Málaga City Hall, Spain;1. Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics (RICAM), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria;2. Institute of Discrete Mathematics and Geometry, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10/104, 1040 Vienna, Austria;3. Research Institute for Symbolic Computation, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria;4. School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK;1. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland;1. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), School of Business, Management, and Economics, University of Sussex, United Kingdom;2. Center for Energy Technologies, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Denmark;3. Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Finland;4. Technical University of Berlin (ZTG), Germany
Abstract:Geographers have become increasingly engaged with the notion of policy mobility. It is argued that in a globalised world policies have become more internationally mobile: we now live in an era of ‘fast policy’. Drawing on core concepts of mobility, neoliberalisation, and globalisation - and with a background primarily in geography and urban studies - policy mobility scholars have developed new ideas about how policies circulate internationally. In the process, however, theories of policy change developed within political science have been rather overlooked. In this paper it is shown how a political science theory with a shared interest in flows – the Multiple Streams Approach (MSA) – is complementary to policy mobilities scholarship. Two issues in particular are illuminated by the MSA: first, what constitutes policy, and, second, the role of the nation state in structuring the possibilities for, and timing of, policy change. In turn, policy mobilities scholarship highlights the different geographies of the multitude of objects, ideas, problems, processes, organisations, and regulations that constitute policy. It also raises questions about the validity of analytically separating politics from policy proposals, as advocated by the MSA. These issues are considered using the empirical case of smart electricity metering policy in Australia, in the period 2000–2015.
Keywords:Policy mobility  Smart meters  Multiple Streams Approach (MSA)  Policy change  Policy window  Australia
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号