首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Contemporary morphodynamics of a high-energy headland-embayment shoreface
Authors:Joni T Backstrom  Derek WT Jackson  J Andrew G Cooper
Institution:1. KULeuven - Center for Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, kasteelpark arenberg 23 - box 2461, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium;2. Laboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron, LNLS, Campinas, SP, C. P. 6192, 13083–970, Brazil;3. Instituto de Física “Gleb Wataghin”, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, C. P. 6165, 13083–970, Brazil;1. Joint Laboratory for Extreme Conditions Matter Properties, Southwest University of Science and Technology and Research Center of Laser Fusion, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China;2. School of science, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China;3. Research Center of Laser Fusion, Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics, P.O. Box 919-987, Mianyang 621900, China
Abstract:A 2-year investigation into shoreface morphodynamic behaviour off a high-energy headland-embayment coast in Northern Ireland reveals important process–response mechanisms that cannot be explained solely by existing conceptual models. Fourteen sequential bathymetric surveys, conducted every 1–2 months, show that morphologic (seabed) change is not directly related to oceanographic forcing—extensive nearshore and shoreface accretion and erosion occurs under fair-weather, modal and high-energy conditions. The main factors which seem to cause significant change are long-duration (swell) events coupled with onshore winds, availability of (recently) introduced sediment, surges and elapsed time between storms and the next scheduled survey. Several high-energy events over a short time period (<30 days) did not result in extensive seafloor changes, contrary to expectations. Net seabed change over 2 years shows an average to 0.6 m m?2 of shoreface accretion from the nearshore to 24 m depth. Net erosion was not observed anywhere, including the subaerial beach. Geologic evidence strongly suggests that the source of the significant volume (7.7×105 m3) of sediment introduced into the study area must have been derived from the lower shoreface and/or inner shelf, beyond 24 m depth.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号